THIS CHART: Premiums Shoot Up For Older Americans Under Senate Obamacare Repeal Bill

The Capitol Dome is seen through a rain-covered skylight in the Capitol Visitors Center, in Washington, Friday, June 23, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
The Capitol Dome is seen through a rain-covered skylight in the Capitol Visitors Center, in Washington, Friday, June 23, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank, on Monday released an analysis of the effects of Senate Republicans’ Obamacare repeal bill on health care premiums.

In short: They’ll go up, and especially so for older people.

The above chart tracks the increase in premium price for “silver plan” insurance coverage for a hypothetical 60-year-old with income at 350 percent of the poverty line in 2020.

The below chart tracks the decrease in premium tax credits for the the same hypothetical individual, except now the individual has an income slightly above 350 percent of the poverty line, so that they would not receive any federal tax credit to purchase insurance on the individual market.

CBPP took into account the Senate Republican bill’s cuts to tax credits for individuals purchasing insurance; the bill’s re-arrangement of the tax credit schedule, which would disfavor older people; the bill’s elimination of tax credits for individuals between 350 and 400 percent of the poverty line; and the bill’s stipulation that insurers would now be allowed to charge older people up to five times more than young people, as opposed to three times more under Obamacare. The bill would also eliminate Obamacare’s cost-sharing reductions, insurer subsidies to help low-income individuals afford care.

Read CBPP’s full report here.

This post has been updated.

Latest The Chart
19
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for drtv drtv says:

    The consequences of voting for Trump in two easy charts.

    Thanks so much again, Trump voters. :rage:

  2. Why only 40 states?

  3. Less is not more!

  4. Obama’s fault…

  5. I think it is because the rest are below the chart. My MN which is not shown is probably less in terms of loss in Tax credits or increased premiums.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

13 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fgs Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for leftflank Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for ottnott Avatar for tomj Avatar for dickweed Avatar for slidercrank Avatar for af82matrix Avatar for theresardufy Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for socalista Avatar for maximus Avatar for drtv

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: