Prime Only Members-Only Article

The Errors, Misrepresentations And Weird Analogies In Kavanaugh’s WI Opinion

on September 4, 2018 in Washington, DC.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing on September 4, 2018. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
October 27, 2020 4:27 p.m.

Sometimes, Supreme Court justices could use an editor. In the case of a concurrence that Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a Wisconsin voting dispute, Kavanaugh could have used an editor, a fact checker and someone who could explain the basics of how an election works.

This is a members-only article
Small Team. Big Results.
We’re proud of what our small newsroom has accomplished and it’s not hyperbole when we say that without our members, none of this would be possible.
Free memberships available for students and those experiencing financial hardship.
Already a member? SIGN IN
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: