Prime Only Members-Only Article

The Errors, Misrepresentations And Weird Analogies In Kavanaugh’s WI Opinion

on September 4, 2018 in Washington, DC.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing on September 4, 2018. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
|
October 27, 2020 4:27 p.m.

Sometimes, Supreme Court justices could use an editor. In the case of a concurrence that Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a Wisconsin voting dispute, Kavanaugh could have used an editor, a fact checker and someone who could explain the basics of how an election works.

Prime Only Members-Only Article
To access exclusive analysis and reporting from TPM’s award-winning staff along with:
The Hive Member Forum
Members-Only Newsletter
Exclusive RSS Feeds
Commenting
View All Options
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer:
SPECIAL DEAL FOR PAST TPM MEMBERS
40% OFF AN ANNUAL PRIME MEMBERSHIP
REJOIN FOR JUST $30