Embodying his mob boss cosplay to a cartoonish degree, Donald Trump over the weekend went after two of the handful of House Republicans who have opted to leave Congress early because being a member of the House Republican conference has become too annoying. (There are plenty of official reasons for these retirements and resignations, but many of the lawmakers who were once bright-eyed about legislating have also expressed exhaustion with operating in a perpetual state of near-shutdown while ostensibly in the majority.)
Continue reading “Once You’re In Trump’s GOP, He Won’t Let You Leave Without A Fight”Help Us Build Journalism To Confront Authoritarianism And Withstand The Media Apocalypse
I have been in the absolute thick of it. As a campaign trail reporter and White House correspondent throughout Donald Trump’s rise and presidency, I had a front row seat to the tsunami of paranoia, racism, and political violence that now threatens to consume American society as we knew it. The experience brought me back to TPM after nearly a decade away.
As we are in the final stretch of our membership drive, I’d like to tell you the story of my back-and-forth journey with TPM and why I hope you will join me here.
Continue reading “Help Us Build Journalism To Confront Authoritarianism And Withstand The Media Apocalypse”Kari Lake’s Default Judgment Request In Defamation Suit Borrows From MAGA Playbook
Last week, election denier and failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake announced that she would not defend her statements in a months-long defamation suit brought against her by Maricopa County recorder Stephen Richer.
Continue reading “Kari Lake’s Default Judgment Request In Defamation Suit Borrows From MAGA Playbook”Understanding Papa Don’s New Pump and Dump 8-K
I mentioned last week that Truth Social — Trump’s social network — only had a bit more revenue than TPM. And needless to say, TPM doesn’t have a multi-billion dollar stock valuation. (If anyone disagrees on this point, contact me.) Today the company released its first 8-K, basically one of the many SEC-mandated disclosures for public companies in which lying means committing a crime. There’s a bit more there on the inflows and outflows. TS brought in about $4.1 million last year and spent $58 million. So that means that TS had about 30% more revenue than TPM and roughly 20 times the expenses. Not great! There’s some other interesting details, like the fact that $39 million of that $58 million went to interest payments. Go figure.
These data points are pretty good evidence that this company is a joke. And they make for good fun. But it’s not proof. A social network in its early stages can be bleeding lots of money and still be legitimately worth a ton of money. This isn’t just hypothetical. Facebook had already become a force of nature before Mark Zuckerberg turned his attention to monetizing the engine of value he created. So there was a time when Facebook was also spending way more money than it made and investors were dying to buy in. Those who did made tons of money.
So the revenue and expenses aren’t the proof. But the proof is there.
Continue reading “Understanding Papa Don’s New Pump and Dump 8-K”Chief Judge Of Kacsmaryk’s District Will Ignore New Anti-Judge Shopping Policy
The chief judge of the northern district of Texas, home to infamous Trump judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, has informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that the district will not change its case assigning practices, in repudiation of a new anti-judge shopping policy.
“The district judges of the Northern District of Texas met on March 27, 2024, and discussed case assignment,” Chief Judge David Godbey wrote to Schumer in a letter dated March 29. “The consensus was not to make any change to our case assignment process at this time.”
Continue reading “Chief Judge Of Kacsmaryk’s District Will Ignore New Anti-Judge Shopping Policy ““We All Saw It”
Along with seven or eight other papers, which tend to be in swing or swingish states, I subscribe to The Cleveland Plain Dealer. So I get various emails from them. And one is an email that comes from their editor, Chris Quinn. I glance at these occasionally but they normally deal with local issues or issues about the paper that are more for local residents. But one came Saturday that grabbed my attention. The headline was “There aren’t two sides to facts” and, as Quinn explains, it’s an answer to Trump supporters who complain that the paper judges Trump and Biden by two separate standards.
Continue reading ““We All Saw It””Apocalyptic Picture Trump Paints For Evangelicals Shows Where Campaign Is Headed
Donald Trump’s late February speech to the annual National Religious Broadcasters’ convention received a short-lived spurt of media attention, largely for its menacing pledges to protect Christians from supposed persecution by a “wicked system” and the “radical” left. But it would be a mistake to consign this speech to one-day-on-the-campaign trail status. Despite some assessments of the speech as “rambling,” “wild,” and “incoherent,” it actually lays out a cogent, comprehensible narrative — for evangelicals.
As the presidential campaign heats up, his seemingly bizarre oratory is a critical window into how the Trump campaign plans to maintain and mobilize his core base of white evangelicals, and potentially peel off more Black and Latino evangelicals along the way.
The NRB’s yearly convention is the premier gathering of Christian talk show hosts and influencers celebrating its mission of promoting “Christian broadcasters’ right to communicate the Gospel of Jesus Christ to a lost and dying world.” The 80-year-old organization, with over 1,100 members and a robust presence in Washington, represents the local and national Christian media landscape, from televangelists, radio sermonizers, podcasters, and social media influencers. NRB claims that 141 million Americans listen to or watch religious broadcasting at least once a month, on more than 4,000 Christian television and radio stations across the country. In his speech, Trump praised the talk show hosts as “brave independent Christian journalists,” and “pastors, podcasters, producers, and patriots” who are doing “an incredible thing for humanity.” The NRB speech gave Trump’s megaphone a ripple effect to others with smaller, but cumulatively powerful megaphones of their own.
While much of the coverage of the speech focused on his promises to end supposed anti-Christian persecution, Trump had been sounding those themes for months before the NRB speech, ratcheting up his attacks on Biden and the “radical left” as his own legal perils accumulated. The full speech, with characteristic digressions, incomprehensible improvisations, and outrageous lies on matters of both great and minimal importance, reveals how what outsiders see as Trump’s deficits are seen by evangelicals as heroism and even divine inspiration.

White evangelicals are Trump’s most reliable supporters. Prominent evangelicals and televangelists kept his presidency afloat through scandals and impeachment, stood by him on and after January 6, and persist in repeating his stolen election lies and conspiracy theories. One of his lead boosters is his long-time friend Paula White, the controversial televangelist with a peppy self-help message for women and a penchant for turning sinister spiritual warfare themes into patriotic cheerleading for Trump. After a close relationship to the Trump administration, including a stint as advisor to Trump’s Faith and Opportunity Initiative, White has returned to her Florida church — and to leading the National Faith Advisory Board (NFAB), a nonprofit organization that claims to be continuing the work “we began at the White House.”(Although the NFAB’s website lists an Arlington, Virginia post office box as its address, the Florida incorporation papers for the NFAB list the same address as White’s City of Destiny church.)
The week after Trump’s NRB speech, the NFAB’s email newsletter boasted that its own members — including Texas megachurch pastor Jack Graham, Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and author and television and radio host Eric Metaxas, a prominent election denier — were on hand. The email linked to a recap of Trump’s remarks, compiled by the Christian right legal firm First Liberty Institute, condensing “religious liberty highlights” of the speech into digestible and familiar bullet points: support for “people of faith;” Trump’s accomplishments protecting “conscience,” banning abortion, defending Israel, and stacking the federal bench.
The First Liberty/NFAB summation provides useful talking points for Trump surrogates who might have difficulty reprising a meandering monologue that went on for more than an hour, or at least making it seem less unhinged. A crucial element of his NRB speech was centering his support for Israel, even calling “my David,” his former ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, to the stage to praise him as “the greatest friend that Israel ever had in the Oval Office, by far.” Trump’s claimed support for Israel (in reality support for Israel’s far right) is charged and symbolic for evangelical audiences, who are steeped in lurid Christian Zionist narratives foretelling the second coming of Jesus and his victory over the Antichrist. They believe that the Bible commands Christians to support Israel — in practice, to support Israel’s far-right governing coalition — and that Israeli consolidation of its occupation and annexation of Palestinian land is a precondition of Christ’s return.. Israel, they believe, is where their actual messiah will return. In the meantime, while they wait, Trump stands in as a messianic figure saving Christian America from “the toxic poison of gender ideology” and “from the Communists and the freaks.”
Just like evangelists portray Satan as both all-powerful but ultimately falling to the godly forces of good, Trump makes Biden seem both capable of destroying America in a short time but also “an incompetent president who doesn’t know what the hell he is doing. He will not lead us to the promised land.” At one point, Trump “joked” (to laughter) that he wasn’t even sure that Biden knew he was alive.

Yet this supposedly feeble man and his allies have caused, according to Trump, 38% inflation, the war in Ukraine and Hamas’s attack on Israel, among other things. (Needless to say, none of this is true, including the cited inflation rate.) Trump’s enemies have also “thrown open our borders to an illegal alien invasion by the world’s most sadistic criminals and savage gangs, while putting peaceful pro-life citizens behind bars” and “unleashed mobs of foreign jihadists to praise Hamas in our streets.” Trump portrayed schools as hellscapes teaching “critical race theory, transgender insanity and other inappropriate racial, sexual or political content,” and promised to “restore the timeless truth that God created two genders, male and female” and to “sign a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states.”
In Trump’s twisted, false narrative, Christians are “hunted down by the Biden regime,” by “the same Biden DOJ that dropped charges against Antifa, where they kill people.” He then claimed that, in Portland, because of Antifa, “they don’t even have storefronts anymore,” and because of the “invasion” of immigrants, “cities are being inundated, they’re being overrun, they’re taking the parks from children, there are no more baseball fields, no more soccer fields.”
However macabre this sounds to outsiders, to evangelicals steeped in end-times prophecy, these nightmarish scenarios are real. They believe they are waging spiritual warfare against demonic spirits bent on destroying an America God intended to be a Christian nation. For them, Trump’s accomplishments are more than just a checklist of judges and abortion policy; his entire being is a divinely ordained force powerful enough to upend Satan’s plans.
Between now and November, mobilizing his spiritual warriors by continually divorcing them from reality will be the most potent get-out-the-vote tool he has. And if it turns out not to be enough, he always has this constant reminder, as he told the NRB: “They rigged the election.”
The Easter Madness Of Donald J. Trump
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.
Trump’s Messianic Complex
I trust that most of you were offline celebrating the holiday, warming to the Spring, welcoming baseball back, or watching college basketball. Congrats on missing another unhinged online weekend for Donald Trump.
Over the course of 70+ posts Easter morning, Trump vilified and attacked a wide range of his antagonists in ALL CAPS zeal. At the same time, he reposted articles declaring himself to be “The Chosen One.”
The contrast between the irreligious candidate embracing Christian nationalism and the lifelong Irish Catholic was, shall we say, striking:
It’s all so infantile and incredibly ridiculous that you can hardly be blamed for not wanting to be bothered about it over the weekend.
Just Say It!
Somehow the NYT can’t bring itself to use the phrase “Christian nationalism” in its story on “The Church of Trump: How He’s Infusing Christianity Into His Movement.”
The story fails to place Trump’s bible-thumping faux populism in the broader historical context of right-wing extremism and Christian nationalism. It also has the effect of conceding too much. Trump is embracing a certain corrupted brand of Christianity (that many Christians themselves find offensive), and it gives him both too much credit and allows him to co-opt Christian images and motifs.
Trump Keeps Up Attack On Trial Judge’s Daughter
After days of sustained attacks by Donald Trump on the daughter of the trial judge in the hush money case, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg asked the judge Friday to tighten up the gag order against Trump. Over the weekend, the former president responded by reposting images of the trial judge’s daughter. The judge could rule on Bragg’s request as soon as today.
Beware of April Fool’s Day:
The Next Phase Of Trump’s Delay Strategy
I’ve been meaning to flag for you in advance the likely next phase of the Trump delay strategy, when the most ostentatious and obvious “dog ate my homework”-style excuses are likely to come in an effort to gum up the works in his criminal trials. But Joyce Vance has beat me to it with this succinct warning: “There are also the time-honored strategies of the desperate: getting sick or finding a sick or dying family member and firing your lawyers.”
Trump Accountability Miscellany
- MAL: Judge Aileen Cannon’s “shadow docket,” as explained by the invaluable Roger Parloff.
- Georgia RICO: Trump and his co-defendants appealed the trial judge’s decision not to disqualify Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis.
- Election Delegitimization: The vicious cycle of election denialism, notes TPM’s Khaya Himmelman:
The concern now, going into November, is not only another uptick in threats against election workers, but the continuation of a larger delegitimization cycle that originated in 2020: a greater number of clerical election errors due to new and inexperienced election staff, leading to more election conspiracy theory fodder, and ultimately culminating in more violence and another wave of resignations, where the vicious cycle begins again.
COVID … Four Years Later
- A sobering and necessary thread from ER doc Craig Spencer on the first wave of COVID in NYC.
- The WSJ can be so inadvertently grim sometimes that it takes my breath away: “Occupancy rates at many senior communities, which fell during Covid-19 era, are rising.” All that pandemic dying made it hard on investors in senior living facilities.
- Brian Beutler on COVID and the Baltimore bridge disaster:
[W]e know from Trump’s response to COVID, and to a number of other disasters that struck non-Republican states and territories during his single term, that if he inherits the effort to rebuild after this disaster, he will likely sabotage it or hold it hostage until the leaders of Baltimore and Maryland offer him political favors or concessions. It’s a reminder in microcosm of one of Trump’s most disqualifying abuses of power …
Bridge Disaster In B’more Brings Out The Racism
There’s a right way and a wrong way to deal with racist attacks on Black elected officials.
The WaPo handled it the right way, with a nice tidy headline: “Baltimore mayor weathers racist attacks after bridge collapse.”
The Sunday shows took a different tack, confronting Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott (D) and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) with the bogus “DEI” attacks from the right and demanding they react.
In the TV news world, this is called giving them a chance to respond. Scott and Moore each handled the situation gracefully, but they’re the victims of racist attacks and challenging them to confront the attacks or defend against them on air has a certain detached and tone deaf quality to it. “Is this racism?” Dana Bash asked Moore, as if the white anchors can’t identify it themselves. And so the responsibility for explaining and contextualizing the racist attack falls on the victims themselves.
LOLOL
Bellingcat, the open-intel investigative outfit, has been able to geolocate Ammon Bundy, on the lam in Southern Utah, based on YouTube videos he’s posted. A great thread on Bundy to accompany the Bellingcat finding.
2024 Ephemera
- The American Conservative, in an essay titled “Trump 2028”: It’s time to ditch the 22d Amendment and its two-term limit.
- WaPo: Many GOP billionaires balked at Jan. 6, but now they’re coming back to Trump.
- WaPo: Cesar Chavez’s family tells RFK Jr. to stop using activist’s name and image
‘Made From 100% Bible’
Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!
Things Tumbling in Israel
Keep an eye on the events out of Israel. It seems possible they’re reaching some kind of turning point, though one hesitates to use that phrase about a country which has been in such an extended political paralysis for so long. The key to understand is that whatever crisis or shift may be in the works isn’t driven by the issues animating coverage in the U.S. To the extent it is tied to the Israel-Hamas war it is about the hostages and the widespread belief that the Netanyahu government isn’t that focused on striking a deal to get them home. Hovering around this is the fact that the government has at best tended to ignore and shun the hostages families. The communities along the border with Gaza tend to be made up of left-leaning Kibbutznik types. So they’re not Netanyahu’s people by any stretch of the imagination. That’s been a subtext to much that has happened over the last six months.
You also have the anti-judicial coup coalition which was holding massive weekly protests for almost a year before October 7th going back to the streets. All of that had stopped cold on October 7th. It’s been slowing reassembling since. But the protests this weekend are bigger than any since just before the massacres in southern Israel. They are now a coupled message for the government to resign and to bring the hostages home.
Continue reading “Things Tumbling in Israel”Amazon, SpaceX And Others Are Arguing That The NLRB Is Actually Unconstitutional
This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at The Conversation.
Amazon, SpaceX, Starbucks and Trader Joe’s have all responded to allegations that they have violated labor laws with the same bold argument. The National Labor Relations Board, they assert in several ongoing legal proceedings, is unconstitutional.
SpaceX, for example, says that the NLRB is engaging in “an unlawful attempt … to subject Space X to an administrative proceeding whose structure violates Article II, the Fifth Amendment, and the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.”
If these companies prevail, the entire process for holding union elections and for prosecuting employers who break labor laws — in place since the days of the New Deal — could collapse. That would leave U.S. workers more vulnerable to exploitation.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the board nearly a century ago, soon after President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the law that created the NLRB and made clear that workers have the right to organize and bargain collectively. Justices have also rejected similar arguments in cases involving other agencies.
As a law professor who researches labor law and constitutional law and a former labor organizer, I am deeply concerned, but not surprised, by these attacks on the federal agency that has protected U.S. workers’ right to organize unions and bargain collectively with their employers since the 1930s.
These corporations seem to believe they will find a sympathetic audience before the conservative justices that occupy six of the Supreme Court’s nine seats. In a series of prior cases, the conservative justices have already weakened administrative agencies and cut back on workers’ rights.
Growing support for unions
The corporate attack on the NLRB also seems to be a response to growing support for unions among Americans.
Workers at the companies that are challenging the NLRB’s constitutionality have all begun to organize unions in recent years, with numerous, high-profile, union-organizing wins. Workers across numerous sectors, including auto, education, health care and Hollywood, have recently held successful strikes.
What’s more, the NLRB has been more assertive in prosecuting employers for violating workers’ rights, and it has been revising rules in ways that make it easier for workers to organize.
For example, it has made it possible for the unionization process to move faster and has sought to quickly reinstate workers who are illegally fired for organizing unions, rather than waiting years for litigation to play out.
The Supreme Court and big business
This is not the first time that big business has tried to use constitutional law arguments in an effort to stop union organizing and limit workers’ rights.
From the 1890s to the 1930s, during what is known as the “Lochner era,” corporations argued that laws protecting workers’ rights, including the right to organize unions or be paid a minimum wage, violated their “freedom to contract” and exceeded Congress’ power under the Constitution.
Back then, the Supreme Court routinely sided with business.
It struck down hundreds of laws, including minimum wage laws, overtime laws and laws prohibiting child labor. It prohibited strikes, including in the railroad and mining industries. It allowed labor leaders to be jailed.
These rulings helped corporations grow wealthier and more powerful.
Only after mass uprisings by over 1 million workers, economic distress wrought by the Great Depression and overwhelming popular support for the New Deal did the Supreme Court finally change course, recognizing that it had made a mistake.
During the New Deal, the justices ruled that Congress has the power under the Constitution to pass minimum labor standards and to create agencies, such as the National Labor Relations Board, to protect workers and consumers.

Letting agencies make decisions
Now, nearly 100 years later, the NLRB’s foes contend that the labor board violates the separation of powers — the constitutional principle that the judicial, legislative and executive branches of government have distinct powers — because it mixes executive and judicial functions.
They also argue that the board is unconstitutional because presidents cannot fire the NLRB’s members or administrative law judges whenever they want.
And opponents of the NLRB claim that the use of administrative law judges — jurists who preside over and adjudicate cases regarding alleged violations of the law — violates the constitutional right to a jury trial.
But the Supreme Court has long permitted all of these features, not only for the NLRB but for other government agencies as well.
And for good reason.
No provision of the Constitution prohibits Congress from designing government agencies in this way. And Congress believed that these design choices would help the agency function well.
For example, by prohibiting presidents from replacing all of the NLRB’s administrative law judges for any reason or no reason at all, Congress sought to ensure independence of those judges.
Having each violation of law litigated before a federal jury, rather than administrative law judges deciding cases, could take a lot longer to resolve cases.
Assessing what’s at stake
If these corporations prevail with their constitutional challenges, the NLRB will no longer be able to function.
Currently, it can be very difficult for workers to organize unions, partly because of insufficient penalties and protections in labor law. But if the corporations win, there will no longer be an agency in place to safeguard workers’ rights to organize unions and to negotiate fair contracts with their employers.
Indeed, this threat goes beyond labor rights.
If the NLRB is found to violate the Constitution, other government agencies could be at risk as well, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Election Commission and the Federal Trade Commission. In my view, that would endanger investors, voters and consumers — all Americans.
There is reason to believe the Supreme Court could side with big business if a lawsuit challenging the board’s constitutionality reaches it.
The Supreme Court in its current configuration is more pro-business than it has been in a century. The justices who make up its conservative majority have shown that they are willing to overrule long-standing labor precedents through decisions that have reduced union funding and restricted workers’ access to unions.
The conservative justices have also indicated that they may limit the powers of administrative agencies beyond the NLRB. Most notably, the conservative majority on the court recently crafted a rule known as the “major questions” doctrine, which says Congress must set particularly clear rules when it authorizes agencies to regulate on matters of political or economic significance.
Using this doctrine, the court has overturned a Biden administration regulation designed to protect the environment and has rejected its initial student loan forgiveness program.
The Supreme Court is hearing several other cases this year that threaten administrative agencies, including one that would allow courts to give less deference to reasonable agency rules and one that challenges the use of administrative law judges by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Seeing room for optimism
There is no way to know for certain how the Supreme Court will rule on a case concerning the constitutionality of the NLRB or other federal agencies. There may not be enough votes to overturn years of well-established precedent, even among the conservative justices.
And on labor rights more generally, there is reason for optimism.
Workers are organizing in greater numbers than they have in decades. History teaches that when there is sufficient popular support for unions and workers’ rights, and sufficient mobilization among workers, the Supreme Court sometimes backs off and corporations give up their fight against workers’ rights.
Indeed, even Starbucks recently agreed to begin negotiating with its workers after years of illegally — according to the NLRB — refusing to bargain with them.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.