Judge Blocks Wisconsin GOP’s Early-Voting Restrictions

on August 14, 2018 in Janesville, Wisconsin.
JANESVILLE, WI - AUGUST 14: A sign marks the location of a polling place on August 14, 2018 in Janesville, Wisconsin. Wisconsin voters cast ballots in primary races today to pick challengers for Republican Governor S... JANESVILLE, WI - AUGUST 14: A sign marks the location of a polling place on August 14, 2018 in Janesville, Wisconsin. Wisconsin voters cast ballots in primary races today to pick challengers for Republican Governor Scott Walker, U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and to choose a replacement for retiring Speaker of the House Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) MORE LESS

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday struck down early-voting restrictions Wisconsin Republicans adopted in a December lame-duck legislative session, saying the limits are clearly similar to restrictions he blocked two years ago.

Republicans voted in December to limit early voting to no more than two weeks before an election. The move came after a difficult midterm election in November in which the overwhelmingly Democratic cities of Madison and Milwaukee held early voting for six weeks — far longer than in smaller and more conservative communities.

The GOP lost every statewide race, but retained majorities in the Legislature and quickly convened the lame-duck session to pass bills that Gov. Scott Walker — also defeated in the election — could sign before leaving office.

Walker and Republicans argued the time frame for voting early should be uniform across the state, not left up to each community to determine. Walker argued it was an issue of fairness, and that local communities could decide when within the two-week period to offer early voting.

A coalition of liberal groups with the support of former Democratic U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, asked U.S. District Judge James Peterson to strike down the restrictions three days after Walker signed them into law.

Peterson struck down a similar two-week early voting restriction along with a number of other Republican-authored voting laws in 2016. State attorneys have asked the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse Peterson; that action is still pending.

Peterson wrote Thursday that he can enforce his own orders while the appeal is pending. He said the lame-duck early-voting restrictions mimic the limits he blocked in 2016.

“This is not a close question,” Peterson wrote. Later, he added: “Defendants do not even attempt to show that there is a material difference between the number of days permitted under (the lame-duck law) and the number of days permitted under the previous law.”

Aides for Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, who spearheaded the lame-duck legislation, didn’t immediately respond to email seeking comment.

Scot Ross, executive director of One Wisconsin Institute, one of the groups who brought the challenge, said in a statement that Peterson told Vos and other Republicans “in no uncertain terms that they are not above the law. The Republican attacks on voting rights were unconstitutional when they were passed, they were unconstitutional when the judge struck them down and they are unconstitutional now.”

Peterson also blocked provisions in the lame-duck law that block voters from using expired student IDs and temporary IDs older than 60 days as identification in the polls. He said those restrictions too closely mirror statutes he struck down in 2016 that blocked expired student IDs and invalidated temporary IDs older than 180 days.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: