Judge Holds WI Election Commission In Contempt, Demands Voter Purge

MILWAUKEE, WI - NOVEMBER 06: A voter checks in to cast a midterm ballot at the District 5 Ward 83 firehouse on November 6, 2018 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Voters are turning out in historic numbers to cast ballots whil... MILWAUKEE, WI - NOVEMBER 06: A voter checks in to cast a midterm ballot at the District 5 Ward 83 firehouse on November 6, 2018 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Voters are turning out in historic numbers to cast ballots while considering issues including immigration, a strong economy and President Trump's overall performance. (Photo by Darren Hauck/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Ozaukee County Circuit Judge Paul Malloy found the Wisconsin Elections Commission in contempt of court Monday, fining the board and some individual members for not immediately removing over 200,000 voters from the rolls.

According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Malloy said the board must pay $50 daily, and its three Democratic members who are fighting the purge an additional $250 a day each, every day they do not remove the voters.

“I can’t be any clearer than this,” he said. “They need to follow my order.”

Attorneys for the board maintain that the fines are undue, since they are awaiting news from the appeal of Malloy’s initial decision to remove the voters from the rolls.

The commission consists of three Democrats and three Republicans, and has been frozen in a partisan deadlock. They will meet Tuesday to decide whether to start removing the voters.

The debacle all started in October, when the commission reached out to more than 230,000 people to confirm that they still lived at the same address, or to ask for an update if they’d moved. Nonresponsive voters would have been removed from the rolls in 2021.

The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty filed a lawsuit, demanding that action be taken to remove the voters much sooner. Malloy agreed in his ruling, demanding that the voters be purged immediately.

Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul asked the District 4 Court of Appeals in Madison to review the case after Malloy’s ruling. Meanwhile, those who brought the initial lawsuit are trying to get the state Supreme Court, with its Republican majority, to take up the case before the appeals court makes a decision.

The liberal League of Women Voters also filed a lawsuit in federal court to try to keep voters on the rolls.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    This seems bizarre. A Judge who’s more a partisan zealot than a cool-minded, dispassionate arbiter of the law.

    Imagine if Federal Judges behaved similarly when faced with all of Trump’s frivolous appeals?

  2. Avatar for dont dont says:

    doesn’t take any imagination

  3. Seems a little rushed to Purge the Non Responsive Voters to me, which indicates to me the Judge is not an independent judiciary. The damage will be greater if the voters are purged and his decision overturned.

    I also hate that more and more, “radical” groups are wanting to bypass court layers in haste to get an action they want.

  4. When did this happen?

    The liberal League of Women Voters

    I always thought they were bipartisan. Wish they’d sponsor the debates again.

  5. Wisconsin. A long history of making Illinois politicians look saintly by comparison…

    A very difficult task…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

96 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for alliebean Avatar for jcs Avatar for meri Avatar for marlowe Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for globalguy Avatar for becca656 Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for dont Avatar for pb Avatar for pshah Avatar for nobiru Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for an_american Avatar for noonm Avatar for burningquestions Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for becauseofjunk Avatar for pablointhegazebo Avatar for bloomingpeonie Avatar for gilgamesh Avatar for Hatmama

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: