White House Official Testifies That Call Memo Omitted Direct Biden References

National Security Council Director for European Affairs Alexander Vindman arrives for a closed-door deposition at the US Capitol on October 29, 2019. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official who listened in on President Donald Trump’s July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, testified Tuesday that the White House omitted some details from the conversation in the publicly released call memo.

According to the New York Times, Vindman tried to edit those details back into the final document. At least two of the quotes he tried to put back in — where Trump says that there are recordings of former Vice President Joe Biden discussing Ukraine corruption and where Zelensky specifically names Burisma, the company Hunter Biden sat on the board of — were ignored.

Vindman’s changes may not have been made to the partial transcript because it was already locked away in a secure server, which NSC lawyer John Eisenberg reportedly did to prevent leaks.

There are other instances actually left in the call memo released by the White House of Trump talking about the Bidens and asking Zelensky for a “favor,” but Vindman’s testimony sheds some light on the content of the mysterious ellipses punctuating the short summary.

Vindman also told the House committees that he was so concerned about the Ukraine pressure campaign that he twice alerted Eisenberg, episodes detailed in his prepared remarks.

Per CNN, Vindman’s hearing grew to such a fever pitch that various Democrats and Republicans got into a screaming match, as members like Intel Committee chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) accused Republicans of trying to get Vindman to divulge the whistleblower’s identity. An anonymous GOP lawmaker did not deny the accusation in a later interview with CNN, saying “we would like to know.”

Latest News
158
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Not a transcript, it was a Memo!

  2. I’m…I’m…shocked! Where are my pearls and fainting couch!

  3. In a functioning democracy, with an independent legal system, this would surely be the end of the road for a person in high office responsible for upholding and respecting the Constitution and the rule of law. The ferocity of the exchanges - said to have characterised the hearing - suggest that even the dimmest GoPers now get it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

152 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for cervantes Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for tao Avatar for kitty Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for demyankee Avatar for rickjones Avatar for greysea Avatar for katscherger Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for erik_t Avatar for iamsmall Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for holywah Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for nydan516 Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for JorgeP

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: