New Report Shows WH’s Ruthless Campaign Against Vindman After Impeachment

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, an expert on Eastern European affairs on the National Security Council, testifies before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence as part of the impeachment inquiry into Presid... Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, an expert on Eastern European affairs on the National Security Council, testifies before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, November 19, 2019. The hearings are looking into whether Trump used military aid as leverage to pressure Ukraine into investigations that would benefit him politically. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI- PHOTOGRAPH BY UPI / Barcroft Media (Photo credit should read UPI / Barcroft Media / Barcroft Media via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A new report has shed light on the extent to which the White House went after Lt. Col. Alex Vindman after his blockbuster impeachment testimony.

The National Security Council reportedly sent a list of criticisms against Vindman to the Pentagon following his House impeachment hearing against President Trump.

According to an NBC News report Wednesday, citing one person who has seen the document and two others briefed on it, the document accused Vindman of creating a hostile work environment at the NSC. It was sent as Vindman was being considered for a promotion to colonel.

People familiar with the document told NBC News that the allegations in the document would have hindered Vindman’s promotion in the Army and noted that it’s not how military officers serving on the NSC are typically evaluated when their temporary positions end. Vindman was set to return to the Defense Department about six months after the Pentagon received the document.

The people familiar with the document also told NBC News that the Pentagon “conducted a command-level investigation” into the allegations against Vindman, seeking evidence to substantiate the claims regarding Vindman’s conduct during his time at the NSC. The military found that the accusations could not be corroborated, which included an accusation that Vindman had verbally abused a colleague, according to a senior administration official.

NBC News noted that the list of allegations could possibly suggest that the White House attempted to derail Vindman’s promotion in the Army who the President viewed as disloyal.

Despite the President’s opposition to Vindman’s promotion, the Pentagon planned to move forward with it this summer. Two people familiar with the matter told NBC News that Defense Secretary Mark Esper communicated to the White House that he would not remove Vindman’s name from the Army’s list of promotions and that blocking Vindman’s promotion would hurt Trump’s presidency.

Last week, Vindman resigned from the military due to how President Trump led a “campaign of bullying, intimidation, and retaliation” after his testimony in last year’s impeachment inquiry, according to a statement from his attorney Amb. David Pressman.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. One hopes Lt. Col. Vindman will receive a position in the Biden administration.

  2. NBC News noted that the list of allegations could possibly suggest that the White House attempted to derail Vindman’s promotion in the Army who the President viewed as disloyal.

    So, Chiselin’ Trump now considers the entire Army to be disloyal to him?

  3. So…the WH determined the best way to black ball him. Nice. Then…according to the report, the military dove deep to SUBSTANTIATE the claims. I would prefer they conducted a command-level investigation to show he was innocent.

    The Pentagon “conducted a command-level investigation” into the allegations against Vindman, seeking evidence to substantiate the claims regarding Vindman’s conduct during his time at the NSC. The military found that the accusations could not be corroborated, which included an accusation that Vindman had verbally abused a colleague, according to a senior administration official.

  4. Here comes another leak investigation.

  5. Two people familiar with the matter told NBC News that Defense Secretary Mark Esper communicated to the White House that he would not remove Vindman’s name from the Army’s list of promotions and that blocking Vindman’s promotion would hurt Trump’s presidency.

    Is it the Sec. of Defense’s job to protect Trump or the country?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

137 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for jackster Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for tacoma Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for buckson Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for prometheus_bic Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for faydout Avatar for ClutchCargo Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: