WH: Trump Asserts Exec Privilege Over ‘Nadler’s Blatant Abuse Of Power’

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 10: U.S. President Donald Trump walks towards the microphones to speak to members of the media prior to his departure from the White House April 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. President Trump wil... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 10: U.S. President Donald Trump walks towards the microphones to speak to members of the media prior to his departure from the White House April 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. President Trump will sign an executive order on energy and infrastructure during his visit at International Union of Operating Engineers International Training and Education Center in Crosby, Texas. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department announced Wednesday that it asked President Trump to assert executive privilege over the full, unredacted Mueller report and its underlying evidence, making good on an earlier threat that the DOJ would do so if House Democrats held the attorney general in contempt.

In a statement, the White House pinned the decision on House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler’s “blatant abuse of power.”

“The American people see through Chairman Nadler’s desperate ploy to distract from the President’s historically successful agenda and our booming economy. Neither the White House nor Attorney General Barr will comply with Chairman Nadler’s unlawful and reckless demands,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement, just as the House Judiciary Committee met to take the contempt vote.

The Justice Department piled on the Nadler blame game in a letter to the chairman sent right as the hearing commenced.

“Regrettably, you have made this assertion necessary by your insistence upon scheduling a premature contempt vote,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote.

Nadler started the committee hearing Wednesday arguing that he doesn’t take a contempt vote “lightly” and offered to continue to “consider any reasonable offer made by the department even after today’s vote.”

“But if a letter I received late last night from the department is any indication, I’m concerned that the department is heading in the wrong direction,” Nadler said in his opening statement. “In response to our latest good faith offer, the department abruptly announced that if we move forward today it will ask President Trump to invoke what it refers to as a protective assertion of executive privilege on all the materials subject to our subpoena. Just minutes ago, it took that dramatic step.”

“Besides misapplying the doctrine of executive privilege, since the White House waived these privileges long ago and the department seemed open to sharing these materials with us just yesterday, this decision represents a clear escalation and the Trump administration’s blanket defiance of Congress’ constitutionally mandated duties,” he continued. “I hope that the department will think better of this last-minute outburst and return to negotiations.”

The two branches of government have been engaged in negotiations, and a very public tit-for-tat, since the redacted version of Mueller’s report was released last month. Nadler and Judiciary Committee Democrats want lawmakers to receive an unredacted version of the report, along with the grand jury materials and all the underlying evidence. Attorney General William Barr has claimed that he is unable to release the grand jury materials. The DOJ offered to allow 12 members of Congress and two staffers to view an unredacted version of the document in a secure location, but Nadler pushed back: he wants all members of the House and Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees to review it.

In his letter to Trump officially recommending he invoke executive privilege over the report — on a probe that investigated whether his campaign colluded with Russia and whether he obstructed justice — Barr reiterated that he is legally unable to release underlying evidence and pointed to the Judiciary Committee’s “abrupt resort to a contempt vote” as rationale for the privilege request.

“In these circumstances, you may properly assert executive privilege with respect to the entirety of the Department of Justice materials that the committee has demanded, pending a final decision on the matter. … As the attorney general and head of the Department of Justice, I hereby request that you do so.”

Read Barr’s letter to Trump bellow:

Attorney General William Barr’s letter to President Trump requesting he invoke executive privilege over the Mueller report.

Read the DOJ’s letter to Nadler below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. How can you assert executive privilege to conceal your crimes?

  2. It looks cheap for the WH to make it about Nadler. They don’t even bother to think of a more righteous reason.

  3. That’s not how they’ll present it in court, of course.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

242 more replies


Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for kilgoretrout Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for sandyh Avatar for darcy Avatar for thebishop Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for brewhousebob Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for redemptionsong Avatar for greysea Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for drtv Avatar for katex Avatar for zillacop Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for dicktater Avatar for sprawlmaven Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: