WH Declines Invitation For Peter Navarro’s Testimony On Whistleblower Complaint

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 29: Director of the National Trade Council Peter Navarro looks on as President Donald Trump meets with supply chain distributors in reference to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, in the Cabine... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 29: Director of the National Trade Council Peter Navarro looks on as President Donald Trump meets with supply chain distributors in reference to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, in the Cabinet Room in the West Wing at the White House on Sunday, March 29, 2020. (Photo by Pete Marovich-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump’s trade adviser, who features prominently in a lengthy whistleblower complaint on the administration’s response to COVID-19, declined an invitation to testify at a House hearing on the matter.

Dr. Rick Bright, who until recently was the head of a crucial research and development office in the Department of Health and Human Services, wrote in a lengthy complaint last week that Navarro was a lonely voice in the Trump administration pushing to prepare for the pandemic in early February.

Bright last week was reassigned as director of BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, to a position at the National Institutes of Health. The Office of Special Counsel recommended last week that Bright’s move be delayed until his complaint can be investigated more fully, Bright’s lawyers said.

The White House declined the invitation to have Navarro testify “based on the longstanding precedent, followed by administrations of both political parties, rooted in clearly established constitutional doctrines, and supported by the Department of Justice, that senior advisors to the President generally do not testify before Congress,” spokesperson Judd Deere told the Washington Post.

Bright’s whistleblower complaint painted Navarro as a key voice in the administration, and an ally to Bright, warning that more should be done to prepare for COVID-19. In early February, as the pandemic’s threat to the United States remained a little-discussed news item, “Navarro shared Dr. Bright’s sense of urgency, recognized his expertise, and was prepared to help,” Bright’s complaint read. But Bright, Navarro and others ran into political and bureaucratic obstacles, according to Bright’s complaint.

In one instance cited in the complaint, the assistant secretary for preparedness and response, Bright’s superior Robert Kadlec, referred to Bright’s briefing Navarro as his “Weekend at Peter’s.”

After more of Bright’s briefings on supply chain issues in February and March led to several urgent White House memos from Navarro, “HHS’s leadership acted with increased hostility towards Dr. Bright and made disparaging comments about the pressure they were receiving from ‘Rick’s friend’ in the White House,” Bright’s complaint alleged.

The Post obtained a copy of Rep. Anna Eshoo’s (D-CA) invitation for Navarro to testify on Thursday before the House Energy Subcommittee on Health. Bright will be there to discuss his complaint.

Eshoo described Navarro to the Post as “a key figure in Dr. Bright’s whistleblower complaint and is a high-level authority in the Trump administration who took Dr. Bright’s warnings seriously.”

“It’s unfortunate the administration is not willing to make witnesses available to the House,” she said.

Kadlec and HHS secretary Alex Azar have also received Eshoo’s invitations but neither plan on testifying, the Post reported citing an unnamed White House aide.

Bright’s complaint also alleged that Trump administration officials applied political pressure in order to make the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine, which Trump had boosted as a potential treatment for COVID-19, widely available to Americans for off-label use.

Latest News
29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The White House declined the invitation to have Navarro testify “based on the longstanding precedent, followed by administrations of both political parties, rooted in clearly established constitutional doctrines, and supported by the Department of Justice, that senior advisors to the President generally do not testify before Congress,” spokesperson Judd Deere [told the Washington Post]

    Yeah, yeah, yeah…We’re going to drive a Mack truck through that word “generally”.

  2. “It’s unfortunate the administration is not willing to make witnesses available to the House,” she said.

    “Well, it turns out I’m the most — and I think most of you would agree to this — I’m the most transparent President, probably in the history of this country.” - DJT, May 22, 2019

    Discuss.

  3. As they eliminate everyone in DC who has a functioning brain, will we recognize the point at which we are doomed? I am pretty sure we don’t have a functioning government anymore, and the states are going bankrupt. Next steps?

  4. Have courts ever ruled on just how deep into the Executive Branch the alleged privilege extends granting a President a shield on advisors from giving testimony or being subject to oversight? Seems to me a President could assert he’s received advice and counsel, at some time or another, from every single person in the Executive.

    “They all talk to me, I solicit opinions from all of them. I deliberate with all of them, collectively, before I make a decision.”

  5. Here’s the truth: Navarro was on Dr. Bright’s side and THAT’S why he needs to be locked in the White Dungeon.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for mickeyg Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for boidster Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for arun Avatar for pine Avatar for d2square Avatar for caltg Avatar for birdford Avatar for brian512 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for skeptical Avatar for bloomingpeonie Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for anon84323658 Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: