Warren Privately Apologizes To Cherokee Nation For DNA Test Stunt

BOSTON, MA - JANUARY 21: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), listens during a rally for airport workers affected by the government shutdown at Boston Logan International Airport on January 21, 2019 in Boston, Massachusett... BOSTON, MA - JANUARY 21: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), listens during a rally for airport workers affected by the government shutdown at Boston Logan International Airport on January 21, 2019 in Boston, Massachusetts. As the partial government shutdown enters its fifth week, the stalemate between President Donald Trump and congressional Democrats continues as they cannot come to a bipartisan solution on border security. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) privately spoke with the principal chief of the Cherokee Nation and apologized for taking and publicizing a DNA test that showed she had a Native American in her family ancestry, the New York Times reported Friday.

A spokesperson for the Cherokee Nation told the Times that Warren “apologized for causing confusion on tribal sovereignty and tribal citizenship and the harm that has resulted.”

“The chief and secretary of state appreciate that she has reaffirmed that she is not a Cherokee Nation citizen or a citizen of any tribal nation,” Julie Hubbard, a spokesperson for Bill John Baker, head of the Cherokee Nation, told the Times.

Warren was berated for releasing DNA blood test results that showed she had a Native American ancestor several generations ago. Warren, who initially did not apologize publicly, was criticized for not only for playing into President Trump’s “Pocahontas” mocking, but also for appearing to claim a Native American heritage based on blood and not the culture or citizenship values most Native Americans see as vital to tribe membership.

As the Times notes, Chuck Hoskin Jr., the secretary of state for the Cherokee Nation, penned an op-ed in the Tulsa World this week that outlined why Warren’s move was problematic.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Good lord. Its like she wants to keep people talking about this.

  2. Avatar for reggid reggid says:

    Apologizing? For a DNA test that proved what her family had always told her? WTF? For fuck’s sake, she never claimed was a member of the Cherokee nation, just that she had some Cherokee ancestry. What a complete non-issue and non-scandal.

  3. I can only assume her team has done some polling and found that the constant right-wing yammering about this somehow works for her.

  4. Funny, Warren never sought to benefit economically from her Cherokee heritage. Contrast that with Kevin McCarthy’s brother-in-law, awarded nearly $8 million in no-bid government contracts at China Lake and LeMoore, on the grounds he was a “discriminated Cherokee”. With zero consequences even if a) his tribe is unrecognized, and b) federal nepotism laws make it illegal for a close relative of a member of congress to receive a massive benefit without disclosure and a written exemption that the conflict of interest has been resolved. Had the law been enforced, McCarthy would be sitting in prison at this moment.

  5. The criticism seemed unwarranted to me. But then again I am a white guy and the criticism was coming directly from the native American community, so shrug

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

74 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for voreason Avatar for tsalagi51 Avatar for evan Avatar for yskov Avatar for blugrass Avatar for tom_streeter Avatar for gharlane Avatar for reggid Avatar for tena Avatar for henk Avatar for kwd101 Avatar for morrigan_2575 Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for kenp Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for corncaucus2008 Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for dominic Avatar for writeon1 Avatar for seadog Avatar for outis Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for haddockbranzini

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: