Couple Suing Waldorf-Astoria For Refund After Guest’s Gunfire Ruined Wedding

FILE - In this Oct. 6, 2014 file photo, a taxi passes in front of the fabled Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. A police source said a wedding guest’s gun went off accidentally at New York’s Waldorf Astoria Hotel... FILE - In this Oct. 6, 2014 file photo, a taxi passes in front of the fabled Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. A police source said a wedding guest’s gun went off accidentally at New York’s Waldorf Astoria Hotel, Saturday, June 13, 2015, and a few people suffered minor injuries from debris. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File) MORE LESS

NEW YORK (AP) — The couple whose wedding at Manhattan’s famous Waldorf Astoria hotel was cut short when a guest’s gun accidentally went off wants their money back.

Benjamin Brafman, a lawyer representing bride Anna Goldshmidt and her husband Elan Stratiyevsky, says they intend to sue or negotiate with the hotel for the costs of the wedding.

The couple also is considering a lawsuit against Vladimir Gotlibovsky, a guest at their wedding who accidentally fired his gun, grazing a woman in the head.

Charges against him have been deferred.

Brafman didn’t say how much the wedding cost.

A Waldorf Astoria New York representative says the reception was canceled due to safety concerns. The hotel says it made the decision on the “paramount concerns of the safety and security” of the guests and employees.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

45
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I would say the hotel is completely blameless. The couple should be suing the guest who irresponsibly secured his firearm and discharged it in a public place and injured another guest. He should still be sitting in jail for endangering the public. If the 2nd Ammendment fetishists insist upon rights, they must also accept the responsibilities that go with it. If you’re going to carry a weapon, you are responsible to secure it in such a way as not to endanger or injure the public with it. The 2nd Ammendment is not a license for a free fire zone. The hotel is completely right to have cancelled the event. It was already obvious that it was unsafe, as exemplifed by the fact that someone got shot. That could very easily have been staff at the hotel or another guest. For the hotel’s own liability, it’s essential that they not allow the event to continue.

  2. excuse me but why sue the hotel wasn’t it one of the guest that brought his gun to the wedding …and wasn’t HE responsible for the gun going off not the hotel??? sue his ass

  3. Avatar for cmb cmb says:

    The hotel could be liable if it allows weapons on the premises.

    I thought weapons had to be declared and secured in NYC hotels. I don’t know for certain what the Waldorf’s policy is but if they allow guests to roam the premises with weapons, other guests may have a claim against them as well as the negligent gun nut.

  4. I don’t know the laws in New York State or New York city, but I know that in much of the south and the sunbelt, hotels can’t exclude firearms. They’re stuck hoping nobody shoots anyone else.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for eve Avatar for paulw Avatar for alliebean Avatar for seek Avatar for deuce Avatar for dv01 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for humpback Avatar for cmb Avatar for vonq Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for kenstarr Avatar for whiteboar Avatar for adamw Avatar for leathersmith Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for backlit Avatar for azjude Avatar for beattycat

Continue Discussion