Texas Supreme Court Sides With AG To Pause COVID-19 Absentee Voting Push

Voting rights primer
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This piece is part of our weekly Prime series on voting rights, but it has been moved outside of the paywall while we cover COVID-19.

As most states are proactively trying to expand absentee voting in light of the pandemic, Texas is pushing for the opposite, by aggressively fighting efforts by local officials and voter advocates to make absentee voting easier. The state’s Republican officials secured a preliminary victory in the fight. Democrats and voting rights groups had gone to court to make fear of contracting the virus a valid excuse for voting absentee, as some local officials indicated they would treat the fear as such. The groups had some success in lower state courts, and also have a related federal lawsuit pending, but the state Supreme Court on Friday said it was putting the lower state court rulings on hold while it considers the case on its merit. Friday’s ruling was a victory for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is arguing that only those who show signs of having contracted the virus qualify for the state’s exemptions to vote absentee.

Here are some more legal developments in the national fight over pandemic voting:

  • The ACLU filed a lawsuit in Tennessee, one of the few other states not recognizing the pandemic as a valid excuse to vote absentee, to loosen those restrictions.
  • Democrats filed an additional absentee voting lawsuit in federal court challenging Texas‘ restrictions on ballot harvesting, its signature matching requirements, its deadlines for the process and its lack of paid postage.
  • The state supreme court in Pennsylvania dismissed one lawsuit seeking to loosen the deadlines around absentee voting, but another lawsuit that is asking a federal court to change the deadlines, among other things, is still alive.
  • Disability advocates are suing Wisconsin to get absentee request forms sent to all registered voters and to force the hiring of more poll workers.
  • A federal court in Georgia dismissed a lawsuit seeking to delay the June primary there due to the pandemic.

Missouri GOP Gets Measure Cutting Anti-Gerrymandering Reform On Ballot: Missouri voters will be asked this fall to water down several anti-gerrymandering redistricting provisions they approved in 2018, with a ballot initiative advanced by statehouse Republicans last week. The new initiative also would let Missouri exclude non-citizens from its redistricting count, a longstanding goal of the GOP that would shift political power to white voters and away from diverse communities.

Lawsuit Seeks To Loosen North Carolina’s Ex-Felon Voting Restrictions: In non-coronavirus election news, voter groups are challenging North Carolina’s ban on ex-felon voting while they are on probation, parole, or post-release supervision. Nearly 60,000 North Carolinians are blocked from voting under the ban, according to the lawsuit, and the prohibition has a disproportionate effect on African Americans.

House Dems Push Major Pandemic Voter Reforms: Voting rights remains a priority for House Democrats in their pandemic-related bills, even if most of the measures stand little chance in the GOP Senate.

  • The coronavirus relief bill the House passed Friday expanded absentee and early voting, lowered some of the hurdles to voting absentee and boosted funding for adapting elections to the pandemic.
  • The House bill also would give the Census Bureau more time to complete its work, while blocking the release of citizenship data for redistricting purposes, as President Trump has pushed.
  • A separate House proposal would eliminate the state match requirement for receiving the election funding previously appropriated by Congress in prior COVID-19 response laws.
Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. but the state Supreme Court on Friday said it was putting the lower state court rulings on hold while it considers the case on its merit.

    Let me guess, the hold will be just long enough to make it impossible for Texas to print and plan to handle the additional mail in ballots expected by the change.

  2. What’s really awful about a decision like this is that the alternative in some states to a court decision regarding absentee voting is to put it on the ballot as an initiative or proposal so that if not this time, at least the next time expanding the electorate is up for a vote. It may not be a solution for the next election but its an alternative. That’s what was done in MI before this pandemic hit, we got no excuse absentee voting passed because it was on the ballot, and it passed overwhelmingly.

    But in order to do that today, people have to be approached and petitions have to be signed (same as always), which means getting those done might break social distancing protocols and approaching people who may not have masks on or would be more guarded about their personal space. That all becomes a little harder without some creative remedy. I suppose it can be done, but how many people would want to take on that responsibility now considering the dangers of exposure to others?

  3. The GOP has finally taken voter suppression to its ultimate conclusion.

    By killing the voters.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

15 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for ghost Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for piratecove Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jjstatz Avatar for justruss Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: