US To Still Compete In Olympics Despite Trump Admin’s ‘Open Question’ Remark

American Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley speaks during a Security Council meeting on the situation in North Korea, Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2017 at United Nations headquarters.  (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
FILE - In this Nov. 29, 2017, file photo, Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, speaks during a Security Council meeting on the situation in North Korea, at United Nations headquarters. The U.S. Olympic... FILE - In this Nov. 29, 2017, file photo, Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, speaks during a Security Council meeting on the situation in North Korea, at United Nations headquarters. The U.S. Olympic Committee still plans on bringing teams to the Pyeongchang Games in February despite U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley casting doubt on U.S. participation. In an interview Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, with Fox News Channel, Haley was asked if it's an open question about whether the U.S. team will compete at the Olympics in South Korea, given the tensions on the Korean Peninsula. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

(AP) — Members of the Trump administration surprised the U.S. Olympic Committee by suggesting the nation’s participation at the upcoming Pyeongchang Games in South Korea was “an open question,” and the USOC responded by saying it has no plans on pulling out.

The confusion began when U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley, in response to a question in a Fox News interview, said “There’s an open question” about whether the U.S. team would travel to South Korea, where tensions have grown high after a series of missile tests in North Korea and inflammatory rhetoric between its leader, Kim Jong-un, and U.S. President Donald Trump.

The USOC responded with a statement Thursday saying plans to compete in the Olympics, which run Feb. 9-25, hadn’t changed. Shortly after that, White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters “no official decision has been made.”

She later clarified in a tweet, saying: “The U.S. looks forward to participating in the Winter Olympics in South Korea. The protection of Americans is our top priority and we are engaged with the South Koreans and other partner nations to secure the venues.”

The USOC doesn’t receive federal funding, and technically, the official decision on participating belongs to the committee and the athletes themselves, all of whom would be guided by directives from the State Department, which has not issued any travel restrictions to South Korea.

The USOC is in frequent contact with the State Department, the organizing committee in South Korea and law enforcement about security issues in Korea and other places that members of the U.S. team travel.

In September, the USOC’s head of security, Nicole Deal, sent a letter to members of the U.S. delegation saying “Despite current political tensions with North Korea, there is no specific information to suggest there are imminent threats to U.S. citizens or facilities in South Korea.”

That same week, USOC CEO Scott Blackmun said, “From our perspective, with the information we currently have, it’s full-steam ahead.”

It’s the same position the USOC held as of Thursday, and athletes who have been faced with the question haven’t wavered on their intention to compete.

“I was in Pyeongchang last February and as far as I’ve been told over the past year by the USOC, everything is basically the same,” figure skater Nathan Chen said last month. “I didn’t feel any security threats while I was there and I feel like everything will be basically the same for this upcoming Games. I trust the USOC 100 percent and I know that they would do the best for all of their athletes.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Good lord. What kind of cowards are these Trumpers?
    The Olympians aren’t scared.

  2. Avatar for fess fess says:

    …Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters “no official decision has been made.”

    Trump mouthpiece says on his behalf, “I’m important, I’m important, I’m important.”

  3. Nikki Haley is yet another Scaramucci, Lewandoski, Gorka, etc. of the Trump administration.
    Fearful, yet deny fear.
    Pompous statements beyond their authority or knowledge that lack any basis with reality.
    Al Haig would be proud.

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Open question - WTF? Is he pouting because Pootie is pouting over being banned?

  5. That was my assumption when I read the headline.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for fess Avatar for ghost Avatar for caterpillar Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for micaiah Avatar for losamigos Avatar for joelopines Avatar for pippenpippen Avatar for quax Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for tena Avatar for tiowally Avatar for irishbark Avatar for biggb Avatar for woland66 Avatar for maximus Avatar for isaacbnyc Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: