PUEBLO, Colo. (AP) — The United States is about to begin destroying its largest remaining stockpile of chemical-laden artillery shells, marking a milestone in the global campaign to eradicate a debilitating weapon that still creeps into modern wars.
The Pueblo Chemical Depot in southern Colorado plans to start neutralizing 2,600 tons of aging mustard agent in March as the U.S. moves toward complying with a 1997 treaty banning all chemical weapons.
“The start of Pueblo is an enormous step forward to a world free of chemical weapons,” said Paul Walker, who has tracked chemical warfare for more than 20 years, first as a U.S. House of Representatives staffer and currently with Green Cross International, which advocates on issues of security, poverty and the environment.
The work starts less than a year after chlorine gas killed 13 people in Syria in April 2014. International inspectors concluded last month that the gas had been used as a weapon.
Before the chlorine attack, 1,400 people were killed in a 2013 nerve gas attack in Syria, the U.S. said.
Pueblo has about 780,000 shells containing mustard agent, which can maim or kill, blistering skin, scarring eyes and inflaming airways. Mustard agent is a thick liquid, not a gas as commonly believed. It’s colorless and almost odorless but got its name because impurities made early versions smell like mustard.
After nightmarish gas attacks in World War I, a 1925 treaty barred the use of chemical weapons, and the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention set a 2012 deadline to eradicate them. Four nations that acknowledged having chemical weapons have missed the deadline: the U.S., Russia, Libya and Iraq.
The cost of safely destroying the weapons, and concerns about public health and the environment, have slowed the process, experts say. Violence in Iraq also has been an obstacle.
Libya expects to finish in 2016 and Russia in 2020, according to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which oversees the Chemical Weapons Convention. Iraq’s completion date is unknown.
The U.S. amassed 30,600 tons of chemical weapons, both mustard agent and deadly nerve agent, much of it during the Cold War. The Army described them as a deterrent, and the U.S. never used them in war.
Nearly 90 percent of the U.S. stockpile has been eliminated at depots in Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Oregon, Utah and Johnson Atoll in the Pacific, mostly by incineration.
Coloradans worried, however, about mercury vapor from incineration, said Irene Kornelly, a member of the Pueblo Citizens Advisory Commission, a liaison group established by Congress. The opposition in Colorado and in Kentucky, where chemical weapons are stored at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Richmond, prompted Congress to order alternatives.
The Army will use two methods for the Pueblo stockpile. In March, the first of an estimated 1,400 shells that are leaking or otherwise damaged will be placed in a sealed steel chamber with walls up to 9 inches thick. Explosives will tear open the shells, and the mustard agent will be neutralized with chemicals.
The remaining hundreds of thousands of shells will be run through a partially automated, $4.5 billion plant starting in December or January. It will dismantle the shells, neutralize the mustard agent in water, and then add bacteria to digest and convert the remaining chemicals. The end product can be disposed of at a hazardous waste dump.
The plant can process up to 60 shells an hour, but the explosion chamber can destroy just six shells a day.
Pueblo expects to finish the job in 2019 — more than 55 years after some of the shells there were produced.
Blue Grass won’t start destroying weapons until 2016 or 2017, finishing in 2023, Army spokeswoman Kathy DeWeese said. All told, it’s costing about $11 billion to destroy remaining U.S. chemical weapons.
Blue Grass has 523 tons of chemical weapons, only about one-fifth as many as Pueblo, but it has nerve agent, and some of the mustard agent is so old it has solidified and is more difficult to deal with, DeWeese said.
Officials who oversee the Pueblo operation insist it is safe, citing years of careful planning and training, as well as the remote location — an empty expanse of sagebrush some 15 miles from the city’s outskirts.
Army Lt. Col. Mike Quinn declined to discuss the specifics of security at the 36-square-mile depot, but signs warn, “Use of deadly force authorized.”
Kornelly said she has no remaining concerns, but she’s not ready to celebrate.
“I think once we start seeing the weapons go through, there’ll be a feeling of accomplishment,” she said. “Right now, everyone’s on pins and needles.”
___
Follow Dan Elliott at http://twitter.com/DanElliottAP.
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Death panels…I knew it! Those agents must have been really deep cover.
Ageism…
LawksA-Mercy.
/s
I was born and raised in close proximity to the Bluegrass Army Depot. The Army has been trying to build something on that base to destroy the steadily deteriorating 1940-60’s vintage mustard and nerve gas shells stockpiled there since the early 1980s. And now, thirty years later,those shells are still stored there, the deterioration having now reached the point that leaking shells in the bunkers are a regular occurrence.
And, year after year, plan after plan, local NIMBYism by people who, IMO, were incapable of correctly weighing the risks of doing nothing against the risks of disposal, thwarted every proposal for destroying those shells and their contents.
High temperature incineration, chemical neutralization–you name it and the aging NIMBY hippies (the depot is in a county with a private college at one in and a regional state university at the other and the faculty meeting mentality infects even those nominally unaffiliated with Academe) generated grave concerns about how something might go wrong, or (this was my favorite) being deeply concerned that chemical neutralization would generate toxic waste, all the while apparently assessing “doing nothing” as a zero risk approach.
My favorite plan they came up with for dealing with the problem was, rather than building an incinerator onsite, loading all of the leaky, deteriorating nerve and mustard gas shells (did I mention that the bursting charges can’t be removed from them?) onto trains and railroading them all the way to Toole, Utah where the exact same kind of plant they were then opposing was already in operation. Because what could possibly go wrong?
I sincerely believe that the waspishness of my exasperation and the often undue intolerance I express when confronted by the earnestly well-intentioned magical thinker variety of liberalism was born of watching these people somehow, get even conservative members of Congress to bend to their irrationality year after year. Year after year, I’d come home for the holidays and discover that their imperviousness to the simple reality that there was no risk free option to dealing with the problem and that all of the options proposed by the Army were less risky than doing nothing remained intact.
The result is that they’re just now finally beginning construction of a disposal plant. More than thirty years later, they’ve either died out, moved away or finally accepted that doing nothing isn’t an option. And, in the process, they’ve succeeded in making doing something more dangerous and more expensive.
But won’t these shells be necessary in our next sanctioned war against Iran, as they were in our previously sanctioned war against Iran when used by our proxy, Iraq?
Nah. When we’re bringing enlightenment to the heathen, we prefer to do it with bombs and shells that are more dangerous to those on the receiving than delivery end.