Unnamed Adviser: Tweet On ‘Fauxcahontas’ Article Wasn’t Howard Schultz’s Fault!

Former Chairman and CEO of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, speaks during the presentation of his book 'From The Ground Up' on January 28, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Johannes EISELE / AFP) (Photo credit should... Former Chairman and CEO of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, speaks during the presentation of his book 'From The Ground Up' on January 28, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Johannes EISELE / AFP) (Photo credit should read JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Former Starbucks CEO and potential 2020 independent presidential candidate Howard Schultz — or at least, the Twitter account belonging to Schultz — deleted a tweet on Wednesday that linked to an article mocking two Democratic presidential hopefuls.

“Thank you @rogerlsimon for a thoughtful analysis of what’s possible. #ReimagineUS” Schultz — or at least, his account — tweeted. Within hours, it was gone.

The article in question, “Howard Schultz Could Actually Win the Presidency,” referred to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as a “shrill (see the Kavanaugh hearings) quasi-socialist” and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as “Fauxcahontas.”

An unnamed “adviser to Schultz” cryptically told The Washington Post that, in the Post’s words, “the former executive was not personally responsible for sending the message.”

Asked if he realized the author of the article had included the language about Harris and Warren, Schultz told CNN Wednesday, “No, I did not.”

“I don’t want to get into revenge politics, which has obviously been the problem that I’m identifying,” he said.

118
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Over priced bitter coffee seller’s face gets more punchable by the day.

  2. “I don’t want to get into revenge politics, which has obviously been the problem that I’m identifying,” he said.

    Never has an argle been bargled harder.
  3. Anyone hitching his wagon to this “starbucks” wannabe POTUS will be disappointed. No way will Vente Man get elected. But he might split the vote in an effort to make sure a GOP thug wins, thus keeping billionaires from paying progressive marginal taxes.

  4. If we can get him down to Harold Stassen levels, we’ll be ok

  5. Agree. He should just go the hell away and stay there.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

112 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for adabsurdum Avatar for maxwellsdemon Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ottnott Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for kitty Avatar for careysub Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for junebug Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for patl Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for tpr Avatar for drtv Avatar for 10c Avatar for atldrew Avatar for captain_america Avatar for kieran

Continue Discussion