Two Kavanaugh Allies Withdraw From Statement Disputing New Yorker Allegation

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Two people who signed onto a statement sowing doubt about the New Yorker’s recent report of a second allegation of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh withdrew their names from that statement on Monday, emphasizing that they were “not present” when the alleged incident occurred and therefore “cannot dispute” allegations from Deborah Ramirez.

Ramirez, in the New Yorker’s words, alleges that Kavanaugh “exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.”

Louisa Garry and Dino Ewing, the former of whom starred in a recent Judicial Crisis Network ad supporting Kavanaugh (pictured above), initially signed onto a statement printed in the New Yorker report asserting that, as “the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale […] we would have seen or heard about [the alleged assault]—and we did not.” Ramirez, the statement added, “never described this incident” until this year.

The New Yorker said in an update Monday that the statement had been “provided by [Kavanaugh’s] attorneys.”

The New Yorker subsequently removed Garry and Ewing’s names from the statement, adding:

(Two students who initially signed the statement, Louisa Garry and Dino Ewing, approached The New Yorker after the publication of this article and asked that their names be removed from it. “I never saw or heard anything like this,” Garry said. “But I cannot dispute Ramirez’s allegations, as I was not present.” Ewing also said he had no direct knowledge of the allegation and considered it out of character for Kavanaugh, but emphasized, “I also was not present and therefore am not in a position to directly dispute Ramirez’s account.”)

And a note at the end of the piece now reads:

This story was updated with comments from two former classmates of Kavanaugh, Louisa Garry and Dino Ewing, who initially signed a statement of support for Kavanaugh provided by his attorneys. They approached The New Yorker after this story was published and asked that their names be removed from the statement, saying that they did not wish to dispute Ramirez’s claims.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Whoa you sign something from a friends attorney and you didn’t know what it was referencing? Did you two graduate from Yale?

  2. Getting a little worried, are we? This is a tell on where the story is going and how provable it is. Kav and the GOP are riding a loser into the midterms.

  3. Guess they might be worried the FBI might come calling at some point…and I have seen that ad the the woman who signed (and now unsigned) was in…disgusting.

  4. I’m wondering when some of the parents of those teenage girls’ basketball team the good family man coaches, who were trotted out at the first hearing, remove their daughter from the team. Just to be safe.

  5. Sounds like they learned something after publication.

    I wonder what it could be …

Continue the discussion at

55 more replies


Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for buckguy Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for tena Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for tpr Avatar for grack Avatar for dwendt Avatar for maximus Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for eisenst Avatar for moderately Avatar for carolson Avatar for timorwig Avatar for brancusi Avatar for outis Avatar for atldrew Avatar for cinfl Avatar for arawak

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: