Trump Tries To Throw Legal Wrench In Georgia Election Probe

TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump speaks during a Make America Great Again rally at Richard B. Russell Airport in Rome, Georgia on November 1, 2020. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/... TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump speaks during a Make America Great Again rally at Richard B. Russell Airport in Rome, Georgia on November 1, 2020. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Facing a potential indictment in Fulton County, Georgia, former President Trump pulled one of his favorite moves on Monday: taking legal action to disrupt the investigation before he could be charged.

Attorneys for Trump filed a motion in Fulton County court on Monday asking a judge to throw out a report compiled by a special grand jury which spent the bulk of last year investigating the former President’s effort to reverse his 2020 defeat in Georgia.

The motion seeks to “quash and expunge” the grand jury report, suppress all evidence that the grand jury gathered, and bar Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from using the report to investigate the matter further.

In nearly every case that has placed Trump in jeopardy (there have been many), he has sought to derail the investigation before it could bear fruit. Trump has been successful in this. After years of investigations, not a single probe has notched a charge against The Donald.

Most recently, Trump had unexpected but brief success in the Southern District of Florida, where he asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to block prosecutors from investigating whether he unlawfully retained classified government records after leaving office. Cannon delayed the probe for months until an appeals court shot the effort down.

Trump, with typical bombast, alleged in the Fulton County filing that the investigation “violated all notions of fundamental fairness and due process.”

“The whole world has watched the process of the SPGJ unfold and what they have witnessed was a process that was confusing, flawed and, at times, blatantly unconstitutional,” Trump attorneys argued in the filing. “Given the scrutiny and the gravity of the investigation and those individuals involved — namely, the movant President Donald J. Trump, this process should have been handled correctly, fairly, and with deference to the law and the highest ethical standards.”

The special grand jury, empaneled under a local Georgia judge, spent most of last year calling witnesses in its investigation of Trump’s interference in the 2020 election in the state.

That included interviews up and down the ladder of those involved, including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), attorney Rudy Giuliani, and the fake electors — Georgia Republicans who agreed to masquerade as delegates for a victorious Trump to the Electoral College, even though he lost the state to Biden.

CNN reported on Monday that Willis’ office is considering bringing racketeering and conspiracy charges against Trump.

The grand jury issued its report in January, and recommended that Willis indict an unknown number of people. Willis has said that her decision on whether to do so is “imminent.”

Latest News
135
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I wonder what legal basis he is asserting to quash the results of the special grand jury.

  2. The “pound the table” principle.

    I read the following and wonder if Georgia lacks a vexatious litigant statute:

    “The whole world has watched the process of the SPGJ unfold and what they have witnessed was a process that was confusing, flawed and, at times, blatantly unconstitutional,” Trump attorneys argued in the filing. “Given the scrutiny and the gravity of the investigation and those individuals involved — namely, the movant President Donald J. Trump, this process should have been handled correctly, fairly, and with deference to the law and the highest ethical standards.”

  3. Avatar for kovie kovie says:

    Your honor, this radical prosecutor should be disqualified from indicting me on account of how she’s investigating which proves that she hates me. Only prosecutors who aren’t investigating me should be allowed to indict me.

  4. Trump SOP but unlikely to stop this Georgian train IMHO

    It really seems as if Trump forgot the mob-boss technique of keeping ones hands at least once removed, avoiding overly explicit directions and dealing with those who are unlevered. Putting himself in direct contact with election officers who were not obligated to him and attempting to suborn them in plain language was arrogant and stupid and there are receipts.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

129 more replies

Participants

Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for dont Avatar for lastroth Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for tao Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for noonm Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for kelaine Avatar for stevecoh1 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for garrybee Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for timbomov Avatar for TPM_Prime

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: