Trump Spox Sues To Block Jan. 6 Committee From Accessing His Financial Records

CLEVELAND, OHIO - SEPTEMBER 29: U.S. President Donald Trump participates in the first presidential debate against Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at the Health Education Campus of Case Western Reserve Univ... CLEVELAND, OHIO - SEPTEMBER 29: U.S. President Donald Trump participates in the first presidential debate against Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at the Health Education Campus of Case Western Reserve University on September 29, 2020 in Cleveland, Ohio. This is the first of three planned debates between the two candidates in the lead up to the election on November 3. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former President Trump’s spokesperson, Taylor Budowich, sued the Jan. 6 committee on Friday in an effort to block the panel from obtaining his financial records — and, in doing so, gave an account of his cooperation with the investigation so far.

In addition to the committee and each of its nine members, Budowich sued House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank.

In his lawsuit, Budowich argued that he provided “more than 1,700 pages of documents” and “roughly four hours of sworn testimony” to the committee.

The documents Budowich produced were “sufficient to identify all account transactions” from Dec 19. 2020 to Jan. 31, 2021 in connection with the “Stop the Steal” rally, the spokesperson claims in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also notes that Budowich answered questions at his deposition about payments made and received regarding his involvement in the planning of the rally.

After claiming that he received a notice from his bank that he had until 5 p.m. ET on Christmas Eve to respond to the committee’s request for information — a notification Budowich says he recieved shortly after arriving home from his deposition before the committee — the spokesperson argued that the committee’s request for his financial records showed “a lack of good faith.”

Budowich’s lawsuit was filed a month after the committee wrote in its letter to him that he had “solicited a 501(c)4 organization to conduct a social media and radio advertising campaign to encourage people to attend” a rally supporting Trump and the former president’s election fraud falsehoods.

“The Select Committee has reason to believe your efforts include directing to the 501(c)(4) organizations approximately $200,000 from a source or sources that was not disclosed to the organization to pay for the advertising campaign,” the committee wrote.

Budowich is the latest Trump foot soldier to sue the committee in the past month.

Last week, former Trump adviser Michael Flynn sued the committee over its subpoena for his phone records that compelled him to testify and to produce documents. Flynn, who said he would invoke the Fifth Amendment, lost his lawsuit a day after filing his motion in federal court in Florida.

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows also sued the committee, its members and Pelosi earlier this month, hours after the panel said that it planned on holding him in criminal contempt. After a short-lived engagement with the committee, Meadows went back to stonewalling the panel, claiming executive privilege. Meadows sued to block the enforcement of a committee subpoena for his insurrection-related records and testimony, saying that it was “issued in whole or part without legal authority in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

In a statement following the lawsuit’s filing, Budowich made a chin-scratcher of an argument that the committee’s seeking of information from him — relevant to the breaching of the Capitol by Trump supporters on Jan. 6 as the joint session of Congress worked to certify Joe Biden’s electoral victory — signals that “democracy is under attack.”

“However, not by the people who illegally entered the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, but instead by a committee whose members walk freely in its halls every day,” Budowich said.

Notable Replies

  1. the spokesperson argued that the committee’s request for his financial records showed “a lack of good faith.”
    After all, a gentleman’s word should be sufficient.

  2. In addition to being a stall tactic, do they hope the lawsuit will end up in a court with a Trump-appointed judge who will block the committee’s access?

  3. Wait, I thought those people were just grassroots patriots who flocked to DC to protest. Are you suggesting that the Trump campaign and the Trump White House actually financed the mob who stormed the Capitol and threatened the lives of everyone there?

    Can’t be. Let’s definitely not look at this guy’s bank records since he’s told nothing but the truth.

  4. signals that “democracy is under attack.”

    “However, not by the people who illegally entered the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, but instead by a committee whose members walk freely in its halls every day,” Budowich said.

    Not to worry, soon enough it will be the insurrectionists, and the insurrectionists friendly, that freely roam the halls of Congress. Because they’ll be the elected majority.

  5. Avatar for mec mec says:

    “The documents Budowich produced were “sufficient to identify all account transactions” from Dec 19. 2020 to Jan. 31, 2021 in connection with the “Stop the Steal” rally, the spokesperson claims in the lawsuit.”

    Why is December 19, 2020 the relevant date? Guess records from before that date are under audit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

135 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sedonaz Avatar for zandru Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for brian512 Avatar for justruss Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for dicktater Avatar for mrbill30560 Avatar for mec Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: