Trump Admin Lifts Obama Guidelines Protecting Transgender Students

HOLD FOR STORY FILE - In this May 17, 2016 file photo, a new sticker is placed on the door at the ceremonial opening of a gender neutral bathroom at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle. Hundreds of parents across the country have called on President Donald Trump to embrace Obama-era protections for transgender students that call for letting them use school bathrooms in accordance with their gender identity. In a letter, sent to the president by the Human Rights Campaign late Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2017, more than 780 parents stressed that “all students deserve equal access to a safe, welcoming school and a high quality education no matter who they are.”  (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
HOLD FOR STORY FILE - In this May 17, 2016 file photo, a new sticker is placed on the door at the ceremonial opening of a gender neutral bathroom at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle. Hundreds of parents across the ... HOLD FOR STORY FILE - In this May 17, 2016 file photo, a new sticker is placed on the door at the ceremonial opening of a gender neutral bathroom at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle. Hundreds of parents across the country have called on President Donald Trump to embrace Obama-era protections for transgender students that call for letting them use school bathrooms in accordance with their gender identity. In a letter, sent to the president by the Human Rights Campaign late Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2017, more than 780 parents stressed that “all students deserve equal access to a safe, welcoming school and a high quality education no matter who they are.” (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Wednesday ended federal protection for transgender students that allowed them to use public school bathrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identities.

The Justice and Education departments said in a letter being sent to school districts nationwide that the Obama-era guidance caused a spike in lawsuits over how the guidance should be applied.

It will now be up to states and school districts to interpret federal anti-discrimination law and determine whether students should have access to restrooms in accordance with their expressed gender identity and not just their biological sex.

“This is an issue best solved at the state and local level,” Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said. “Schools, communities, and families can find — and in many cases have found — solutions that protect all students.”

Although the earlier directive carried no force of law, transgender rights advocates say it was necessary to protect students from discrimination. Opponents argue it was an example of federal overreach.

Here’s a look at the issue and what could happen next:

___

WHAT IS THE FEDERAL GUIDANCE FOR SCHOOLS?

About 150,000 young people — 0.7 percent of those between the ages of 13 and 17 — in the United States identify as transgender, according to a study by The Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law.

The Obama administration last May told public schools to grant bathroom access even if a student’s chosen gender identity isn’t the same as what’s in their record. The Obama administration’s guidance was based on its determination that Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education and activities, also applies to gender identity.

President Barack Obama’s guidance was not legally binding but sent a warning that schools could lose funding if they did not comply with the administration’s interpretation of the law.

Republicans immediately pushed back, arguing it was an example of the Obama administration meddling in local matters.

Thirteen states sued to challenge the directive.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Wednesday the Obama administration did not adequately explain its interpretation of Title IX.

“Congress, state legislatures and local governments are in a position to adopt appropriate policies or laws addressing this issue,” he said.

___

WHAT COULD HAPPEN NOW THAT THE GUIDANCE IS WITHDRAWN?

The change in position will have no immediate impact on schools, as a federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the Obama guidance in August.

But it could have consequences for unresolved court cases dealing with Title IX.

They include a case set to be heard by the Supreme Court in March involving a transgender teen who was denied a choice of bathroom access in Virginia.

The high court could decide not to hear the case and direct lower courts to decide that question instead.

Similar lawsuits are still playing out across the country.

___

WHAT MIGHT THE CHANGE MEAN FOR SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS?

Even without the guidelines, advocates say federal law will still prohibit discrimination against students based on their gender or sexual orientation. The ACLU said schools remain free to provide the same treatment to students even without guidance.

“To cloak this in federalism ignores the vital and historic role that federal law plays in ensuring that all children (including LGBT students) are able to attend school free from discrimination,” Vanita Gupta, who was head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division when the guidance was issued, said in a statement.

___

HOW DO STATE LAWS VIEW THE ISSUE?

A patchwork of state laws dealing with the bathroom issue will continue to emerge.

Fifteen states have explicit protections for transgender students in their state laws, and many individual school districts in other states have adopted policies that cover such students on the basis of their gender identity, said Sarah Warbelow, legal director of the Human Rights Campaign. In the states that protect transgender rights, the general approach is to let individuals decide for themselves their gender identity. That’s also how the Obama guidance viewed gender identity for students who are too young for reassignment surgery.

Just one state, North Carolina, has enacted a law restricting access to bathrooms in government-owned buildings to the sex that appears on a person’s birth certificate. But so far this year, lawmakers in more than 10 states are considering similar legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
27
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Lift the protections for trans kids and make sure the mentally ill’s ability to buy firearms aren’t hampered or restricted in any way.

    Sounds like everything’s right on track.

    I was very surprised, however, that the rabidly evangelical DeVos had reservations/objections about this. I can honestly say I didn’t see that coming.

  2. More evidence for all the Nader/Stein/Johnson folks out there on the progressive tip as well as the “centrists” that there is no difference between the parties. I mean, one party protects teenagers struggling with their gender and sex identity and the other removes all the protections.

    See – identical!

  3. It will now be up to states and school districts to interpret federal anti-discrimination law and determine whether students should have access to restrooms in accordance with their expressed gender identity and not just their biological sex.

    This action by the administration of the person who’s currently in the Oval Office is two-fold: First, it accomplishes the goal of letting the Rabid Religionists to call the shots on a hot-button issue near and dear to their “hearts.” Secondly, it sets the stage for further weakening of all federal civil rights actions (such as interpretations of Title IX) by allowing the states to test the boundaries of “states’ rights.” It’s now Open Season on federal laws aimed at leveling the playing field and obtaining fair, equal and just treatment for minorities. More and more states will seek to “interpret” other federal rules and laws.

  4. The Justice and Education departments said in a letter being sent to school districts nationwide that the Obama-era guidance caused a spike in lawsuits over how the guidance should be applied.

    The Trump administration has resulted in a spike in lawsuits over how its policies should be applied. The Trump administration should be withdrawn immediately.

  5. Here, in sad sack Texas, attacks on Civil Rights protections is just like hunting season - you know it’s coming every two years. In spite of pleas from businesses and others who are more sane, our current bathroom bill is making its way through the funny farm.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for amytales Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for charliee Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for danf Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for johnrm Avatar for hquain Avatar for darrtown Avatar for beattycat Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for captaintangent

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: