Trump Announces New ‘Punishing’ Sanctions On Iran In Response To Missile Attack

President Donald Trump looks on during an event about judicial confirmations in the East Room of the White House on November 6, 2019. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump addressed the nation Wednesday hours after Iran’s missile strike, promising “punishing economic sanctions” but adding that the nation “appears to be standing down.”

Trump said that the American people should be “grateful and happy” that no soldiers were killed in Iran’s strikes fired at two Iraqi bases housing U.S. soldiers Tuesday night.

He also spent some minutes praising his and his administration’s killing of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, a man who he said has American blood on his hands and should have been taken out “long ago.”

He urged American allies including German and the U.K. to join the U.S. in pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal to forge a new pact.

In classic form, Trump placed the responsibility for Tuesday’s missile attack squarely on the shoulders of former President Barack Obama, saying that he was responsible for giving Iran the funds they used to purchase the weapons used against the U.S. In reality, the money was Iran’s that was unfrozen during negotiations for the 2015 nuclear deal.

Trump made his address after a half-hour delay as aides came in and out, at one point replacing the statement on the podium.

Some in the administration suspect that Iran purposefully aimed the weapons at areas largely devoid of Americans during the attack.

The tension reached a breaking point after Trump green-lit the missile strike that killed Soleimani late last week, garnering promises of revenge from Iranian officials.

The Trump administration, specifically Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, said that the strike was ordered in response to an “imminent threat” to American lives in the region. Since then, he has declined to provide any meaningful details about the nature of the plot and has shifted the characterization of the attack, painting it as retribution for past violence against Americans instead of a preemptive strike.

Per the Washington Post, Trump argued to aides that the strike would be politically popular, and that Iran wouldn’t “do anything too stupid” in response.

Many European allies to the U.S. have responded to the strike with apprehension, and the Iraqi parliament voted to boot American troops from the country in an attempt to keep the country from becoming a battleground. Despite a mistaken letter to the contrary, the U.S. has no current plans to leave.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Ladies and gentlemen, your “imminent threat.”

  2. Avatar for aiddon aiddon says:

    Somewhere the Evangelicals are going “Awwww, we wanted the end times!”

  3. If I were the Euros (and others) I would make up the sanctions shortfall.

    It would do two things: economic benefit for Iran and the Euros and drawing Iran into greater economic interaction with the West.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

190 more replies

Participants

Avatar for meri Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for sandyh Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for musgrove Avatar for schmed Avatar for tena Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for grack Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for drtv Avatar for aiddon Avatar for zillacop Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for redpill Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for dogselfie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: