Trump Stock In Dakota Access Oil Pipeline Raises Questions

FILE - In this Jan. 19, 2015, file photo, Donald Trump speaks at the South Carolina Tea Party Coalition Convention in Myrtle Beach, S.C. (AP Photo/Randall Hill, File)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump holds stock in the company building the disputed Dakota Access oil pipeline, and pipeline opponents warn that Trump’s investments could affect any decision he makes on the $3.8 billion project as president.

Trump’s 2016 federal disclosure forms show he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 in stock in Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners. That’s down from between $500,000 and $1 million a year earlier.

Trump also owns between $100,000 and $250,000 in Phillips 66, which has a one-quarter share of Dakota Access.

While Trump’s stake in the pipeline company is modest compared with his other assets, ethics experts say it’s among dozens of potential conflicts that could be resolved by placing his investments in a blind trust, a step Trump has resisted.

The Obama administration said this month it wants more study and tribal input before deciding whether to allow the partially built pipeline to cross under a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota.

The 1,200-mile pipeline would carry oil across four states to a shipping point in Illinois. The project has been held up while the Army Corps of Engineers consults with the Standing Rock Sioux, who believe the project could harm the tribe’s drinking water and Native American cultural sites.

The delay, which comes as protests unfold daily along the proposed route, raises the likelihood that a final decision will be made by Trump, a pipeline supporter who has vowed to “unleash” unfettered production of oil and gas. He takes office in January.

“Trump’s investments in the pipeline business threaten to undercut faith in this process — which was already frayed — by interjecting his own financial well-being into a much bigger decision,” said Sharon Buccino, director of the land and wildlife program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group.

“This should be about the interests of the many, rather than giving the appearance of looking at the interests of a few — including Trump,” Buccino said.

Trump, a billionaire who has never held public office, holds ownership stakes in more than 500 companies worldwide. He has said he plans to transfer control of his company to three of his adult children, but ethics experts have said conflicts could engulf the new administration if Trump does not liquidate his business holdings.

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., senior Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, called Trump’s investment in the pipeline company “disturbing” and said it fits a pattern evident in Trump’s transition team.

“You have climate (change) deniers, industry lobbyists and energy conglomerates involved in that process,” Grijalva said. “The pipeline companies are gleeful. This is pay-to-play at its rawest.”

Besides Trump, at least two possible candidates for energy secretary also could benefit from the pipeline. Oil billionaire Harold Hamm could ship oil from his company, Continental Resources, through the pipeline, while former Texas Gov. Rick Perry serves on the board of directors of Energy Transfer Partners.

Concern about Trump’s possible conflicts comes as protests over the pipeline have intensified in recent weeks, with total arrests since August rising to 528. A clash this past week near the main protest camp in North Dakota left a police officer and several protesters injured.

North Dakota Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple, along with GOP Sen. John Hoeven and Rep. Kevin Cramer, called on President Barack Obama to authorize the Army Corps of Engineers to approve the pipeline crossing, the last large segment of the nearly completed pipeline.

Kelcy Warren, CEO of Dallas-based Energy Transfer, told The Associated Press that he expects Trump to make it easier for his company and others to complete infrastructure projects.

“Do I think it’s going to get easier? Of course,” said Warren, who donated $3,000 to Trump’s campaign, plus $100,000 to a committee supporting Trump’s candidacy and $66,800 to the Republican National Committee.

“If you’re in the infrastructure business,” he said, “you need consistency. That’s where this process has gotten off track.”

The Army Corps of Engineers granted Warren’s company the permits needed for the crossing in July, but the agency decided in September that further analysis was warranted, given the tribe’s concerns. On Nov. 14, the corps called for even more study.

The company has asked a federal judge to declare it has the right to lay pipe under Lake Oahe, a Missouri River reservoir in southern North Dakota. The judge isn’t likely to issue a decision until January at the earliest.

___

Follow Matthew Daly: https://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Raises questions? It should be raising special prosecutors.
    The Electoral College is at fault.
    They must be ended.

  2. The wőrd:

    klepto-kakistocracy

    We have lost the moral high ground in matters of world opinion and we will never get it back. There are those in foreign capitals who rejoice in this. As our moral influence fades we will, of necessity, have to rely more on our weapons. Odd sort of turn of events, but not entirely unexpected.

  3. I came across kakistocracy just the other day, and it’s the only one to describe what’s unfolding. “Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.” Or “government by the worst people.” Which is a far cry from the “best people” we were promised. When we inevitably hear rump say if a president does it it means it’s not illegal, then we’ll know we’re in a world of hurt.

  4. I don’t know if it’s worse, but I think it’s at least equally bad that this confirms us as a society that perennially chooses naive, ideological or stupid leaders, and is now wedded to a mentally ill would-be strongman ignoramus bunko artist. We gained some good will back with Obama, but now we’ve lurched further into stupidity and recklessness than ever. I just don’t see how leaders around the world would want to trust us or enter into long-term alliances and other relationships. If we repented of this and somehow cleared it up before the inauguration I think it would still hurt us for decades.

  5. Kelcy Warren, CEO of Dallas-based Energy Transfer, expects Trump to make it easier for his company and others to complete infrastructure projects yet he also claims if you’re in the infrastructure business you need consistency. Somebody should remind him about the eight year long GOP opposition to any and all infrastructure spending and then ask him to reconcile his two statements.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

29 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for slbinva Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for sociosam Avatar for jep07 Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for go2goal Avatar for dddinah Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for texacali Avatar for rickjones Avatar for delmar Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for drwho Avatar for jadez

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: