Trump Administration Threatened Veto Over Ukraine Aid Provision In Spending Bill

WASHINGTON, DC DECEMBER 19: U.S. President Donald Trump exits after speaking at a White House Mental Health Summit in the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building at the White House on Dece... WASHINGTON, DC DECEMBER 19: U.S. President Donald Trump exits after speaking at a White House Mental Health Summit in the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building at the White House on December 19, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Trump administration threatened to veto the massive spending bill passed this week, possibly leading to a government shutdown, if House Democrats didn’t drop a provision that would have required the quick release of $250 million in defense aid to Ukraine.

According to the Washington Post, the language was dropped and the White House said that President Donald Trump signed the bill into law on Friday, averting the Saturday deadline which would have triggered the shutdown.

Democrats were trying to ensure that Trump couldn’t leverage the military aid to Ukraine again, the way he did with the last payment, a pressure campaign at the heart of the impeachment proceedings. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House legislative affairs director Eric Ueland made it clear that the provision concerning the new aid payment was a dealbreaker.

However, Ueland reportedly insisted that their objection was not over Ukraine specifically, but to protect executive branch powers.

Latest News
42
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “When someone shows you who they are believe them; the first time.” ― Maya Angelou

  2. Pelosi exercised MASSIVE restraint here. Unbelievable. But we’ve been warned that he will triple down on his efforts now. Putin must be really putting the screws.

  3. [quote]Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House legislative affairs director Eric Ueland made it clear that the provision concerning the new aid payment was a dealbreaker.

    However, Ueland reportedly insisted that their objection was not over Ukraine specifically, but to protect executive branch powers.[/quote]
    Why would these officials reporting directly to the President-in-impeachment insist so strongly on this point? Assuming that the aid payment were not being used in pursuit of personal political gains as alleged?

  4. I will say this. Trump takes orders well.

  5. It’s just amazing. He can’t not demonstrate that he’s wildly guilty over and over and over again. It’s like Homer Simpson’s “continuing and baffling” desecration of the Sacred Parchment, and not just as a metaphor since there’s actually a fairly venerated parchment involved here too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJiQ3kzlZ_s

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

36 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for micaiah Avatar for maxwellsdemon Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for sandyh Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for pine Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for benthere Avatar for caltg Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for marymaryquitecontrary Avatar for maximus Avatar for libthinker Avatar for tindalos Avatar for enn Avatar for carolson Avatar for nocomment Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for gargoyle Avatar for rockitttla Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: