Trump Admin Seeks Supreme Court Review Of DACA Ruling

NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 10: Activists rally for the passage of a 'clean' Dream Act, one without additional security or enforcement measures, outside the New York office of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), January 10, 2018 in New York City. The Dream Act, first introduced in 2001, is a proposed bill that would allow undocumented immigrants who came to the country as children to stay in the country legally. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 10: Activists rally for the passage of a "clean" Dream Act, one without additional security or enforcement measures, outside the New York office of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), January 10, 2018 i... NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 10: Activists rally for the passage of a "clean" Dream Act, one without additional security or enforcement measures, outside the New York office of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), January 10, 2018 in New York City. The Dream Act, first introduced in 2001, is a proposed bill that would allow undocumented immigrants who came to the country as children to stay in the country legally. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The Trump administration on Tuesday appealed a judge’s ruling temporarily blocking its decision to end protections for hundreds of thousands of young immigrants and announced plans to seek a U.S. Supreme Court review even before an appeals court issues a decision.

Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice said in a court filing that they were appealing the Jan. 9 ruling by a federal judge preventing President Donald Trump from ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

The appeal was filed with the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In a separate news release, the agency said it planned to file documents seeking a review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement that it defied “law and common sense” for a single federal judge to decide the DACA issue.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup in his Jan. 9 ruling said lawyers in favor of DACA clearly demonstrated that the young immigrants “were likely to suffer serious, irreparable harm” without court action. The judge also said the lawyers have a strong chance of succeeding at trial.

He granted a request by California and other plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction against the administration while lawsuits challenging its DACA decision play out in court. Alsup also rejected the administration’s request to dismiss the lawsuits.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement Tuesday that he was “confident the appellate courts will see the logic and justice behind the district court’s issuance of the preliminary injunction.”

DACA has protected about 800,000 people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children or came with families who overstayed visas. The program includes hundreds of thousands of college-age students.

Sessions announced in September that DACA would be phased out, saying President Barack Obama had exceeded his authority when he implemented it in 2012.

Efforts in Congress to reach a deal to protect DACA recipients appear to have gotten more complicated in the wake of Trump’s use of a vulgarity during a meeting with lawmakers last week to discuss an immigration proposal.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement that it defied “law and common sense” for a single federal judge to decide the DACA issue.

    THAT IS EXACTLY HOW OUR LAWS AND OUR CONSTITUTION WORK YOU SHITSTAIN. And may I add, FUCKING HYPOCRITE. Or were you all in a lather over this as well?

    And I’m sure you thought this was “legislating from the bench”, right?

  2. I can’t wait to see this sucker perp-walked out of the DOJ soon.

  3. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    This action, along with others, make it impossible to believe the Trump Administration really wants to save DACA.

    We know Sessions, Kelly, and Miller are hard-liners on this. They’re just flailing at finding a way to blame Democrats as they blow up the compromise.

  4. Has anyone asked or identified all the hardliners on what will happen if they succeed? Do any of them have plans to work with foreign partners in their future? Do any of them want to seek the Oval Office chair?

  5. So trump called gorsuch and said to him, payback time, I own you and you owe me.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for lastroth Avatar for boidster Avatar for pshah Avatar for beattycat

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: