Dem Leader Says It’s ‘Quite Likely’ Nunes Will Be Investigated For Potential Ethics Violation

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) listens during the House Intelligence Committee hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry into US President Donald Trump on Capitol Hill in Washington, ... House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) listens during the House Intelligence Committee hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry into US President Donald Trump on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on November 20, 2019. (Photo by Erin Schaff / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ERIN SCHAFF/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Armed Services Committee Chair Adam Smith (D-WA) said on Saturday that Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) faces an ethics investigation for allegedly working with Lev Parnas, one of Rudy Giuliani’s indicted associates.

During an interview on “AM Joy,” MSNBC host Joy Ann Reid asked Smith about a potential ethics investigation into Nunes after Parnas’ attorney told the Daily Beast on Wednesday that his client had arranged contacts for Nunes in 2018 to help with his “investigations.”

“Quite likely, without question,” Smith responded.

In addition to the Daily Beast report, another one of Parnas’ lawyers told CNN on Friday that former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin told Parnas he had met with Nunes to dig up dirt on Joe Biden.

Joseph Bondy, the attorney who spoke to CNN, said that his client is will to testify to Congress on Nunes’ alleged dealings in Ukraine.

As ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Nunes has used his position to rail constantly against the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump’s Ukraine scheme.

Watch Smith below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for broken broken says:

    Devin “milked” his credibility for a little too long.

  2. Absolutely right to go at this as a conflict of interest, if Nunes was doing investigations and then was supposed to help run impeachment hearings, that’s a clear conflict and he should have recused himself. Dumb move on the part of Republicans to leave him there, both because he’s an incompetent prick but also because this just gave the Republican’s defense a huge whiff of coverup at the Congressional level. That’s going to feed into all the maneuvering in the Senate, so when Trump gets off there is going to be a huge number of people enraged at the unfairness of the process by Republicans, no Democrats (who will have run a fair and honest investigation the whole way).

    Couldn’t happen to a more deserving cow tipper.

  3. Avatar for ghost ghost says:

    Couldn’t happen to a mooooore deserving bovine.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

166 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ghost Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for tacoma Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for junebug Avatar for brewhousebob Avatar for tsp Avatar for brian512 Avatar for grack Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for nocomment Avatar for kenga Avatar for davek319 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for c_stedman Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for Swan

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: