Texas’ Largest County Asks DOJ For Help As SB1 Causes Thousands Of Ballots To Be Rejected

Among 9,809 mail-in ballots received by Harris County, a whopping 35.5%, or 3,491 votes, have been flagged for rejection, county officials said.
AUSTIN, TX - OCTOBER 13: A poll worker stamps a voters ballot before dropping it into a secure box at a ballot drop off location on October 13, 2020 in Austin, Texas. The first day of voting saw voters waiting hours ... AUSTIN, TX - OCTOBER 13: A poll worker stamps a voters ballot before dropping it into a secure box at a ballot drop off location on October 13, 2020 in Austin, Texas. The first day of voting saw voters waiting hours in line to cast their votes. Gov. Greg Abbott announced earlier this year that he would expand early voting for the election beginning on Oct. 13. Mail in voting began on Oct. 8 and has been part of a legal battle after Gov. Abbott declared each county may only have 1 mail in ballot drop off center, the ruling was later struck down in federal court but then the decision was upheld when a stay was ruled in the overturning. (Photo by Sergio Flores/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Texas’ largest county has rejected thousands of absentee ballots and ballot applications due to Republicans’ restrictive new voting law — and now, officials there have asked the Department of Justice for help. 

The new law, SB1, is “achieving exactly what its authors set out to do: erect more hurdles in front of the ballot box and systematically suppress the vote in Harris County,” wrote the county judge, county attorney and county elections administrator in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland flagged Thursday by Houston Public Media. 

Harris County, home to Houston, has for weeks sounded the alarm about early warning signs that SB1 is resulting in unusually large rates of rejected ballot applications.

The trouble comes from Republicans’ new ID requirements for people eligible to vote by mail: The form of that required ID number (whether a driver’s license number, the last four digits of a Social Security number, or state ID number) must match what the voter used to register with the state, sometimes decades earlier. Previously, absentee voters’ identities were confirmed by comparing their signatures to government records. 

The results speak for themselves: Out of 33,270 mail ballot applications received by Harris County as of Feb. 15, 14% were flagged for rejection due to SB1’s new voter ID requirements, according to the county officials’ letter. And among 9,809 ballots received by the county by that date, a whopping 35.5%, or 3,491 votes, have been flagged for rejection for the same reason. 

Voters can cure these rejections, but it’s unclear how many will be able to do so in time to be counted for Texas’ March 1 primary election. 

The letter also flagged the design of ballot envelopes, saying that SB1 is “forcing voters into a game of gotcha by hiding a section of required personal information under the flap of the required voting envelope.” 

“Our message today is simple,” the county officials wrote to the attorney general, who is currently overseeing a federal lawsuit against Texas over parts of SB1. “Please exhaust every legal option available to ensure that each eligible voter in Harris County and the State of Texas has their vote counted. No action is too small to preserve our democracy.” 

Latest News
245
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I thought they wanted to secede. Well, they can get on with it and make the rest of us happy.

  2. Harris is a blue county.

  3. The intention of the law was to reduce democratic turnout and as long that the ballots getting rejected are in Harris, Dallas, Travis and a few other populous counties, Abbot, Paxton and Patrick are going to call it a success. After all those guys don’t even accept that we live in a “democracy” according to them we live in a “republic” and that means it has to be run by Republicans.

  4. SB1 is “forcing voters into a game of gotcha by hiding a section of required personal information under the flap of the required voting envelope.”

    Sounds like @tena has some fellow travelers.

    DoJ steps in, Supreme Court says “not our problem,” it’s precisely what the state legislature has prescribed and there is no longer any Federal law governing elections.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

239 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for slbinva Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for jw1 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for tsp Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for udubtec Avatar for godwit Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for randome

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: