Tennessee’s Anti-Trans Bathroom Bill Fails After Intense Opposition

State Reps. Kevin Dunlap, D-McMinnville, and Kevin Brooks, R-Cleveland, confer during a House Education Administration and Planning Committee meeting in Nashville, Tenn., on Wednesday, April 6, 2016. Dunlap and Brook... State Reps. Kevin Dunlap, D-McMinnville, and Kevin Brooks, R-Cleveland, confer during a House Education Administration and Planning Committee meeting in Nashville, Tenn., on Wednesday, April 6, 2016. Dunlap and Brooks were among the majority of the committee that voted to revive a bill seeking to require students to use bathrooms that match their sex at birth. (AP Photo/Erik Schelzig) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

UPDATE: 6:45 p.m.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A transgender bathroom bill in the Tennessee legislature failed Monday after the House sponsor said she was withdrawing the legislation while waiting to see how legal challenges play out in other states that have passed similar measures.

The bill’s demise follows intense lobbying from both supporters and opponents of the measure and questions about potential economic fallout if it were to become law.

Rep. Susan Lynn, the Mount Juliet Republican who sponsored the bill in the House, said she needed to tweak the legislation before bringing it back up again next year.

“There’s definitely some issues we need to work out,” Lynn said. “We know as soon as this bill passes, we’re going to be sued. So if we’re going to be heading into a lawsuit, we want to make sure we have the strongest position possible.”

The bill would have required all students in public schools and universities to use bathrooms and locker rooms that matched their gender at birth.

Supporters said it would have protected the privacy of students. Opponents called it discriminatory.

Lynn had amended the bill so students who objected could be given an alternative, but opponents said it was still hurtful toward transgender students. She pulled the measure the same day that a religious coalition of the Family Action Council of Tennessee and about 30 pastors urged lawmakers earlier in the day to stand strong in the face of intense opposition.

They asked lawmakers to ignore the “false prophesies of economic gloom and doom” and outside corporations and instead listen to churchgoers, parents and voters in Tennessee.

David Fowler, the president of Family Action Council of Tennessee, blamed the bill’s failure on “consistent opposition from the governor’s office and others.”

“We join the thousands of parents across the state who are profoundly disappointed that at this point in the process Rep. Lynn has decided not to proceed with a bill that would have simply protected the privacy of the children they have entrusted to our public schools,” Fowler said in a statement.

Henry Seaton, a senior at Beech High School in Hendersonville and a transgender student, said he couldn’t understand why lawmakers were targeting people like him now.

“I feel singled out, and I feel stigmatized,” Seaton said earlier in the day.

The state’s attorney general had issued an opinion saying that the state risked losing federal education funds if the measure became law, putting more than $1.3 billion at risk. There was also a backlash from the business community.

The leaders of 60 businesses, including the chief executives of Williams-Sonoma, Hilton Worldwide and T-Mobile, signed a letter last week that asked Tennessee lawmakers to reject the bathroom bill, saying it is discriminatory.

Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, who said he had received calls and emails from a number of business people about the measure, had raised concerns that the state could lose education funding if the measure were to ever become law. Lynn said she had spoken to Haslam before yanking the bill.

“We’ve had conversations about it,” Lynn said. “And those conversations had to do with timing, had to do with strategy, and had to do with some outstanding issues we probably need to address in the legislation.”

She said she still supports the measure.

“I feel very passionately about this issue,” she said. “I really believe that boys should just use the boys’ room and girls should use the girls’ room.”

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Oh, not to worry! They’ll try again next year. Hey, it’s Tennessee where the only good lay is your sister…or step-mom!

    No wonder they raise so many mentally handicapped Republicans.

  2. Avatar for jw jw says:

    Bullshit! If you were born female and have transitioned to male - let’s say you have facial hair, look and dress like a man - now you’re required to use the women’s rest room. HOW is that protecting your privacy?!

  3. Yep, the very thing that they’re supposedly trying to “protect” their kids from.

    EDIT TO ADD: Oh yeah, - next year will be MUCH better.

  4. I found the proposed law offensive as well. But why is your comment accusing an entire state population of incest and inbreeding any less bigoted and offensive than the concerns the lawmakers purportedly had about transgendered people?

  5. Supporters of the measure maintained they were only trying to protect student privacy by looking in their pants and comparing observed plumbing to specificiations given on their birth certificate.

    FIXED THAT FOR YOU YOU FUCKING FUCKERS! AAAGGGGGGHHH!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for boidster Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for rathfulman Avatar for briannaamore Avatar for jw Avatar for machoneman Avatar for owlcroft

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: