The 5 Most Bonkers Team Trump Arguments

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 28: (L-R) President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House counsel Pat Cipollone arrive at the Senate chamber for the Senate impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on Janua... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 28: (L-R) President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House counsel Pat Cipollone arrive at the Senate chamber for the Senate impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on January 28, 2020 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump's legal defense team is expected to conclude their arguments today and begin answering written questions from Senators on Wednesday. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

As the Senate impeachment trial hurtles to a close, the President’s lawyers and House impeachment managers wrapped up around 16 hours of arguments during the question and answer sessions — some serious, and some downright laughable.

Here are some of the most ludicrous moments of the two-day presentations, courtesy of team Trump:

Dershowitz’s Assertion That The President Can Do Anything

Professor Alan Dershowitz made an extreme case for the power of the executive Wednesday, essentially saying that the President can do anything if he believes it will boost his chances for reelection.

“If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment,” he said.

His words sparked general outcry, and Trump’s lawyers tried to distance themselves from that facet of his argument during later presentations.

Actually, Biden Is The One Who Should Be Impeached

White House Deputy Counsel Pat Philbin eagerly seized on a question from a group of Republican senators asking if baseless allegations against Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, would be worthy of impeachment.

Despite the fact that there is no evidence that the elder Biden abused his power to protect his son and the company on whose board he sat, Philbin saw the hypothetical through.

“One could put together fairly easily from those known facts the suggestion that there was a family financial benefit coming from the end of that investigation,” Philbin said, “because it protected the position of the younger Biden on the board.”

He added that such actions would be “problematic” if undertaken by a President.

Let The Voters Decide

A primary team Trump talking point, clearly crafted to give cover to wavering Republican senators, was that the 2020 election is only months away: might as well let the voters decide.

“Most importantly, most importantly,” White House Counsel Pat Cipollone said, closing out Tuesday’s session, [is] “to respect and defend the sacred right of every American to vote and to choose their president. The election is only months away. The American people are entitled to choose their president.”

He added that it would do “serious and lasting damage” to remove the President from office before the election.

Impeachment Is The REAL Election Interference

Relatedly, Trump’s lawyers referred to the impeachment effort as “massive election interference,” an overturning of the last election and tampering with the next.

A clear attempt to rebrand Russia’s election meddling in the 2016 election, Trump’s lawyers tried to argue that the constitutional process of impeachment would rob Trump of his rightful office, no matter the truth of the allegations.

Flub On The Crucial Biden-Ukraine Question

Philbin struggled mightily to respond to a joint question posed by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME) about whether Trump ever mentioned the Bidens in connection to Ukrainian corruption before Joe Biden announced his candidacy for president.

After highlighting the limited scope of the House’s inquiry, Philbin admitted that “…I can’t point to something in the record that shows President Trump at an earlier time mentioning specifically something related to Joe or Hunter Biden.”

Latest News
27
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    New rule:

    If Trump gets away with this, it’s not an “acquittal.”

    It’s a ratification.

  2. Avatar for jrw jrw says:

    Look for Doug Collins to try to introduce pre-impeachment preparations against Biden now.

    And, just to pick a nit, this “trial” hurtles to a conclusion, not hurdles.

  3. the sacred right of every American to vote and to choose their president

    We gerrymander to ensure everyone’s God-given right to have a Republican bureaucrat tell them how to live their lives.

  4. Ms Riga forgot to include the responses any Democrats might have given to the crazy statements. Crazy flies, sane reponses, not so much.

    However, the insanity/inanity may continue longer than predicted, like until after SOTU

  5. An excerpt from the trial rules that McConnell and the Republican majority passed:

    “Motions adopted by the Upper House may deviate from the Constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Legislature. The rights of the President remain unaffected.”

    Oh wait – my bad – that’s from the “Enabling Act of 1933”.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for guineapig Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for globalguy Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for danny Avatar for lastroth Avatar for shystr Avatar for fuzz Avatar for pine Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for benthere Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for tiowally Avatar for j.dave Avatar for cologirl Avatar for jrw Avatar for johnblankenbaker Avatar for swampsofjersey Avatar for mtw Avatar for wpmcconnell Avatar for old_guru Avatar for TR-Devlin

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: