Workplace Retaliation Suit Against Rep. Tammy Duckworth Settled

FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2014 file photo, Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., appears at annual state fair Governor's Day brunch in Springfield, Ill. President Barack Obama’s bid for new trade agreements faces big tests i... FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2014 file photo, Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., appears at annual state fair Governor's Day brunch in Springfield, Ill. President Barack Obama’s bid for new trade agreements faces big tests in Congress in May, mostly from his fellow Democrats. Obama is getting scant help from Democrats who face tough elections next year. For instance, Duckworth of Illinois announced she opposes the fast track bill because it "does not ensure that American workers are put first." (AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — A settlement in the workplace retaliation lawsuit against U.S. Rep. Tammy Duckworth concluded Friday with an agreement that no law was violated, removing an obstacle in her bid to unseat Republican U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk in one of November’s most competitive Senate races.

The lawsuit from two employees of a home for veterans alleged Duckworth, a Democrat, violated state ethics laws by taking action against them when she was head of the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs. The workers contended that she tried to fire one employee and gave another a bad review that cost her raises after the women complained about facility leadership at an Illinois VA home, where they still work. Duckworth was appointed to lead the Illinois VA in 2006 by now-imprisoned ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Duckworth had faced the possibility of testifying if the case went to trial months before the election, which would have given Kirk’s campaign firepower to use the allegations to attack her and to make it an issue with voters.

The contest between Duckworth and Kirk is considered to be one of a handful of competitive races that can determine which party controls the Senate.

“Today’s resolution is appropriate for what was always a frivolous workplace case that dragged on over eight years and was dismissed in whole or in part multiple times, and Tammy appreciates the hard work and professionalism of the lawyers in the Attorney General’s office,” Matt McGrath, Duckworth’s deputy campaign manager said in a statement.

The attorney general’s office represented Duckworth in the case. The attorney general is Lisa Madigan, a Democrat whose father is Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and chairman of the state Democratic Party.

As part of the settlement agreement, the attorney general’s office is paying for the employees’ attorney fees and other court costs, all of which totaled $26,000.

Shortly after the settlement was announced, Kirk’s campaign made clear they would continue to use the case to bash Duckworth, an Iraq war veteran who lost both her legs in 2004 when the helicopter she was piloting was shot down.

“We now know that there are 26,000 reasons why Tammy Duckworth was guilty,” Kevin Artl, Kirk’s campaign manager, said in a statement. “The simple truth is that if Tammy Duckworth was innocent, she would not have settled this case. Instead of taking the stand and testifying, Duckworth has chosen to stay silent and settle the case at taxpayer expense in order to hide from the truth.”

The case was first filed in federal court, where a judge dismissed it. A state court judge did the same, but the case was narrowed and filed a third time in southern Illinois’ Union County.

The attorney general’s office said in a statement that during the hearing Friday “it became clear that we could resolve this matter” to avoid a costly trial.

___

AP writer Don Babwin in Chicago contributed to this story.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The simple truth is that if Tammy Duckworth was innocent, she would not have settled this case. Instead of taking the stand and testifying, Duckworth has chosen to stay silent and settle the case at taxpayer expense in order to hide from the truth.

    … says a person who doesn’t understand why cases get settled. Continuing to defend the suit would have chewed up more than $26k in very short order.

    And BTW, the plaintiffs wouldn’t have settled for their litigation costs if they genuinely thought they had a case. They ended up with, in effect, nothing (other than rendering themselves unemployable going forward).

  2. Finally, Tammy has all of her ‘Ducksworth’ in a row. Haha…yeah-no!

  3. This is exactly right, misterneutron. As a lawyer who represents plaintiffs, I can tell you that $26k is simply zip. The plaintiff will get nothing from this and the lawyers will get some of their out of pocket costs back, but likely nothing in attorney fees. This is a nuisance settlement, plain and simple.

  4. This was a nuisance lawsuit against Duckworth. There was NO evidence she did anything wrong. I agree-- if the plaintiffs had a case, the settlement would have been bigger. I had even forgotten that she was involved in a lawsuit, because it’s not been news here in Illinois for years, mainly because the lawsuit was dismissed at least once due to lack of evidence.

    On a different point — the photo of Duckworth leaving her wheelchair to participate in the House Dems sit-in in election platinum. Kirk has zip.

  5. Just like a liberal to settle.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for ajm Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for leftflank Avatar for ottnott Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for angry_pilgrim Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for beattycat Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for proudbluegirl72 Avatar for jfenne1

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: