Supreme Court Rejects Trump Ban On Asylum Claims At US-Mexico Border

FILE - In this Oct. 5, 2018, file photo, the U. S. Supreme Court building stands quietly before dawn in Washington. The Constitution says you can’t be tried twice for the same offense. And yet Terance Gamble is sit... FILE - In this Oct. 5, 2018, file photo, the U. S. Supreme Court building stands quietly before dawn in Washington. The Constitution says you can’t be tried twice for the same offense. And yet Terance Gamble is sitting in prison today because he was prosecuted separately by Alabama and the federal government for having a gun after an earlier robbery conviction. he Supreme Court is considering Gamble’s case Thursday, Dec. 6, and the outcome could have a spillover effect on the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. (AP Photo/J. David Ake, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won’t let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

New Justice Brett Kavanaugh and three other conservative justices sided with the administration.

The court’s order Friday leaves in place lower court rulings that blocked President Donald Trump’s proclamation in November automatically denying asylum to people who enter the country from Mexico without going through official border crossings.

Trump said he was acting in response to caravans of migrants making their way to the border.

The administration had also complained that the nationwide order preventing the policy from taking effect was too broad.

But Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s four more liberal justices rejected the administration’s suggestion for narrowing it.

Latest News
95
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Roberts, forced into being the new swing justice?

  2. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  3. Ain’t sayin’ there was; nice to see the possibility of it.

  4. There was talk Roberts would be the new swing justice, this seems to give that opinion some credence. Fine with me. :wink:

  5. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    There’s something really sad with a right-wing apparatchik being the swing justice. But it’s better than seeing him vote to ignore the clear letter of the law.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

89 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for voluntarycurmudgeon Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for loretta Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for j.dave Avatar for lisaaug Avatar for asturcot Avatar for krux Avatar for eisenst Avatar for checkmate2016 Avatar for carolson Avatar for godwit Avatar for kenga Avatar for gilgamesh

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: