SCOTUS Ends Court Fight Over Repealed Obama-Era ‘Net Neutrality’ Rules

The US Supreme Court is seen in Washington, DC, on January 31, 2017. President Donald Trump was poised Tuesday to unveil his pick for the US Supreme Court, a crucial appointment that could tilt the bench to conservat... The US Supreme Court is seen in Washington, DC, on January 31, 2017. President Donald Trump was poised Tuesday to unveil his pick for the US Supreme Court, a crucial appointment that could tilt the bench to conservatives on deeply divisive issues such as abortion and gun control. Trump's choice aims to fill a vacancy left by the sudden death of conservative justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, which left the highest US court with four conservative and four liberal justices. / AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has ended the court fight over repealed Obama-era “net neutrality” rules that required internet providers to treat all online traffic equally.

The court on Monday rejected appeals from the telecommunications industry seeking to throw out a lower court ruling in favor of the “net neutrality” rules. The Federal Communications Commission under President Donald Trump has rolled back the rules, but the industry also wanted to wipe the court ruling off the books.

Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have granted the industry’s request. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh took no part in the case without offering a reason.

Kavanaugh ruled on the issue while an appeals court judge and Roberts has an investment portfolio that includes telecommunications companies.

Latest News
41
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Yep…ALL for the middle class and believing that all people are created ‘equal’. Except of course, those with money…

  2. Can someone expand upon what this means going forward? Trump repealed the rules, and yet the lower ruling that went against the telecom industry stands? That seems paradoxical.

    Feeling dense, but missing the bottom line. Does this mean a future president could reinstate the rules?

  3. Avatar for ljb860 ljb860 says:

    Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have granted the industry’s request.

    The dirty three that are bought and paid corporate shills, soon they will add the fourth.

  4. Agreed, not clear what the implications of this are…

  5. Avatar for ljb860 ljb860 says:

    Yep, or Congress could get off their collective azzes, including Dims in this one.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

35 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for politicsinpink Avatar for sysprog Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for progress Avatar for dont Avatar for drriddle Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for katwillow Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for asturcot Avatar for tpr Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for thinski Avatar for tindalos Avatar for aiddon Avatar for seattle_guy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: