Supreme Court To Review Partisan Redistricting

The Supreme Court Building is seen in Washington, Tuesday, April 4, 2017, as Senate Republicans work to confirm President Donald Trump’s nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch to take the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) The Capitol is framed amid the columns of the Supreme Court building in Washington, Tuesday, April 4, 2017, as Senate Republicans work to confirm President Donald Trump’s nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch to take the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
FILE - In this April 4, 2017, file photo, the Supreme Court Building is seen in Washington. In an era of deep partisan division, the Supreme Court could soon decide whether the drawing of electoral districts can be t... FILE - In this April 4, 2017, file photo, the Supreme Court Building is seen in Washington. In an era of deep partisan division, the Supreme Court could soon decide whether the drawing of electoral districts can be too political. A dispute over Wisconsin’s Republican-drawn boundaries for the state legislature offers Democrats some hope of cutting into GOP electoral majorities across the United States.(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) MORE LESS

The Supreme Court is wading into the thicket of partisan redistricting in a case from Wisconsin.

The justices say Monday they will decide whether Republican lawmakers drew electoral districts so out of whack with the state’s political breakdown that they violated the constitutional rights of Democratic voters.

It’s the high court’s first case on what’s known as partisan gerrymandering in more than a decade, and the outcome could affect elections across the country.

The case will be argued in the fall.

A three-judge court struck down Wisconsin’s legislative districts in November and ordered new maps drawn in time for the 2018 elections. That work is proceeding.

23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Have your vomit bags handy for this.

  2. Avatar for dont dont says:

    I do believe I’ve read somewhere Kennedy is not a fan of politicians picking their constituents. This may be a good thing for small d democrats, consequently, for all of us.

  3. Computer Aided Districts are here to stay. Regardless of how this turns out, the GOP will use attitudinal, neighborhood characteristics, etc. to effectively accomplish the same thing.

  4. The best result of this is if they just say politicians can no longer draw districts and a third non partisan party using rules has to do it. No idea how likely such a outcome would be, but that would be the fix for these issues.

  5. Avatar for mymy mymy says:

    Worked beautifully in California, and now AZ is going to have a bipartisan independent redistricting commission I believe.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for joestudent Avatar for mymy Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for kunda311 Avatar for dont Avatar for itsjibba Avatar for explainer Avatar for musgrove Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for mkposs Avatar for socalista Avatar for clare

Continue Discussion