The Wandering Senators: Are Lawmakers Allowed To Roam About During Trial?

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES - JANUARY 21 2020: U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) walks towards the Senate Chamber for the Senate Impeachment Trial in Washington.
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES - JANUARY 21 2020: U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) walks towards the Senate Chamber for the Senate Impeachment Trial in Washington.- PHOTOGRAPH BY Michael Brochstein / Echoes Wire/ Barcr... WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES - JANUARY 21 2020: U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) walks towards the Senate Chamber for the Senate Impeachment Trial in Washington.- PHOTOGRAPH BY Michael Brochstein / Echoes Wire/ Barcroft Media (Photo credit should read Michael Brochstein / Echoes Wire / Barcroft Media via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Reporters present at the impeachment trial in the Senate have noticed a whole host of lawmakers wandering in and out of the chamber during the lengthy days, which earlier this week stretched on until 2 a.m. ET.

A tally from freelance reporter Michael McAuliff during Wednesday’s proceeding:

The observations raise two issues: one of legality and one of optics.

Is It Allowed?

Nothing in the official Senate impeachment rules forbids it. The rules, dating from March 2, 1868, make little mention of the chamber at all, except to determine that the doors to the Senate should be left open, unless the members are in deliberations.

Senate leaders Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) circulated their own guidance ahead of the trial, where they made passing mention of the attendance expectations.

“Senators should plan to be in attendance at all times during the proceedings,” they wrote in the decorum guidelines.

“During the impeachment proceedings, standing will not be permitted on the floor and this requirement will be strictly enforced,” they also wrote. “Accordingly, all Senators are requested to remain in their seats at all times they are on the Senate floor during the impeachment proceedings.”

But that’s about it. And some senators are having little trouble bucking what limited guidance they’ve been given.

Per CNN, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) spent more time out of his seat than in it Wednesday night. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) also left for stretches, while Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) could be seen using his iPhone in the Democratic cloakroom (electronics are banned from the chamber during the trial).

Meanwhile, some of those who may have the most to lose by being sequestered stayed securely in place for the duration on Wednesday. According to CNN, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), both running for President, stayed in the chamber for the entirety of the proceedings. They were reportedly joined by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME), two of the most scrutinized lawmakers due to their past willingness to vote with Democrats.

Does It Look Bad?

It might, if we could see it. A part of the draconian press restrictions of the Senate impeachment trial dictates that only the Senate cameras can film in the chamber, and they are trained on the dais. So, it’s easy for senators to slip out or walk around unnoticed by those not in the room itself.

Senators who’ve addressed the absences seem largely unbothered.

Klobuchar told CNN on Wednesday that aside from people wandering out to use the bathroom or get coffee, she’d estimate that the chamber is filled to about “95%” capacity at any time.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) said that he has no issue with people milling about and talking at the back of the room.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) told CNN that senators are struggling to understand why they have to sit there in the first place, accusing Democrats of presenting the “same arguments over and over and over again.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. It’s all rigged.

    McConnell and most of the GOP Senate have been taking the day off during this sham ‘trial’. In any other legal proceeding in America jurors who showed such flagrant disregard could and would be jailed for contempt.

    But since McConnell has already announced he had no intention of conducting an actual trial, we’re left to observe this Potemkin Village and Kabuki Theater.

  2. My slightly OT question, regarding rules and motions, is whether there is an opportunity for a motion to correct the record? Can Schumer insist that the defense lawyers correct falsehoods regarding their lack of participation in the House inquiry? Specifically, they falsely represented that they were not allowed the opportunity when in fact they declined the offer.

  3. Said the Senator when asked why he voted to acquit Trump “I heard no evidence…”

  4. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    I’m calling my Senators’ offices to ask whether they are staying in the chamber and listening to ALL the proceedings, how much time they are spending outside the chamber. 202-224-3121.

  5. From DK:
    The Democrats should immediately ask questions of evidence requiring Roberts to “rule on all questions of evidence including, but not limited to, questions of relevancy, materiality, and redundancy of evidence (Rule VII of the standing rules for impeachment) as mentioned in scotusblog. Do that every damn time enough Republicans leave the chamber to give the Democrats a temporary majority. Roberts then either has to rule against the Democrat’s requests — and given yesterday they are likely to be VERY well worded — or rule for the Democrats to rebuke the Republican slackers.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

73 more replies

Participants

Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for sooner Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for sandyh Avatar for rick Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for lastroth Avatar for kitty Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for hoagie Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for noonm Avatar for katscherger Avatar for dominic Avatar for psl10432 Avatar for chickulese Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for lcale Avatar for filmknight Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for ANNFFL

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: