Senate Republicans Really, Really Don’t Want To Take Over As Ethics Committee Chair

Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) during a hearing on February 1, 2017. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) poised to leave the Senate at the end of the year, the chamber’s Ethics Committee will need a new leader.

But few of his Republican colleagues are eager to take the reins.

When asked by the Hill on Saturday if they wanted to fill Isakson’s seat as committee chair, GOP senators emphatically rejected the idea.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), who currently serves as the Senate’s Armed Services Committee chair, kept it blunt.

“Are you kidding? Are you kidding?” he said. “I’d rather have a root canal.”

“Nooooo,” Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) told the Hill.

“Oh no, no, no, but I’m sure that the leadership will put somebody in there that’s solid, good, substantive person,” Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Richard Shelby (R-AL) said.

“Absolutely not. Absolutely not,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said with a laugh.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) was more diplomatic, telling the Hill that he’d already served his time on the committee as vice chair, so “I think I’ll give somebody else the opportunity.”

Sens. Jim Risch (R-ID) and Pat Roberts (R-KS), who currently serve on the committee with Isakson, both stressed objection to potentially being handed the role.

Roberts grumbled about being on the “damn committee” for nearly two decades.

“It’s a Senate record,” he complained. “Everybody else gets on and gets off, and they won’t let me get off.”

Isakson said that though it was an “honor” to lead the committee, it’s also not ideal to be in a position in which you have to investigate your own colleagues.

“Well, sometimes you’re asked to do things you’d rather not have to do because you’re dealing with your colleagues,” he told the Hill.

Latest News
114
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Like the right thing, or your fucking job.

  2. Yup. Some mighty powerful and daunting ethical challenges there, especially all the lying to the public. Like looking for a chicken coop guard when all the candidates are foxes and coyotes.

  3. Re: Roberts

    It says a lot, that a departing senator, who should have no more f—ks to give, is reticent to take that role.

    Oh well

  4. They should just appoint a Democrat.

    Why?

    Because it doesn’t matter who the chair of the committee is, the Republican leadership in the Senate isn’t going to pay any attention to any report coming out of the committee.

  5. Perhaps just take a page from the Trump book and appoint an acting chairperson.

    Or leave the position empty.

    After all, ethics is pretty far down the list of things Republicans care about or think has any importance or place in government … unless applied to a Democrat, especially on a made up or inflated accusation.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

108 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for inversion Avatar for psudawnc Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for beattycat Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for junebug Avatar for demyankee Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for birdford Avatar for clairer Avatar for kelaine Avatar for richbhanover Avatar for mtw Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: