WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate Judiciary Committee approved William Barr’s nomination for attorney general along party lines Thursday, with Republicans praising his credentials and Democrats questioning how transparent he’ll be once special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation concludes.
The vote now heads to the full Senate, where Barr is expected to be confirmed in a vote as soon as next week.
Barr, who previously served as attorney general from 1991 to 1993, would succeed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was pushed out by Trump last year over the president’s anger that he had recused from the Russia investigation. Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker is currently filling the position.
“I appreciate what Mr. Whitaker has done, but I think it’s time for new leadership at the department,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and committee chairman, said at the outset of Thursday’s meeting.
Democrats and many Republicans have said they believe Mueller’s final report should be fully released. Barr has said he will be as transparent as possible under Justice Department regulations, but many Democrats are skeptical.
Barr said he takes seriously the department regulations that say Mueller’s report should be confidential. Those regulations require only that the report explains the decisions to pursue or to decline prosecutions, which could be as simple as a bullet point list or as voluminous as a report running hundreds of pages.
“I don’t know what — at the end of the day, what will be releasable. I don’t know what Bob Mueller is writing,” Barr said at his hearing last month.
Democrats have also criticized a memo Barr wrote to the Justice Department before his nomination in which he criticized Mueller’s investigation for the way it was presumably looking into whether Trump had obstructed justice. In the memo, Barr wrote that Trump could not have obstructed justice by firing former FBI Director James Comey since it was act the president was constitutionally entitled to take.
“This is not the time to install an attorney general who has repeatedly espoused a view of unfettered executive power,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, said Thursday.
The top Democrat on the Judiciary panel, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, said last week that she is worried that Barr won’t be a check on the president who appointed him.
“This memo is of serious concern to me and appears to be seminal in his appointment to this position,” Feinstein said.
Trump had repeatedly criticized Sessions for recusing himself from Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election that includes examining the ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. Trump calls the probe a “witch hunt.”
Barr said in his hearing last month that he is a friend of Mueller’s and that “it is vitally important” that the special counsel be allowed to complete his investigation.
“I don’t believe Mr. Mueller would be involved in a witch hunt,” Barr said.
For lack of a better place to put this, Drunk Sean Spicer, really drunk not Jimmy Kimmel slo-mo drunk, asking for his old job back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zmOtWzkkCEHey, AP? What was the vote count?
AP - 24-17 and 17-24
See: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/whitaker-says-hell-blow-off-judiciary-hearing-unless-dems-drop-subpoena-threat
Something’s afoot here. Why is Whitaker delaying for no reason?
It’s possible Barr could be a halfway decent AG (which is the best one can expect with the Trump regime). Nevertheless, he could be a true lawless scumbag who puts Trump and party above country. No one can tell. That’s why it’s good Democrats on the Committee opposed his nomination. That said, Barr will get one or two Democrats on the Senate floor voting for him. (Manchin and one other, perhaps).
Smart Democrats don’t want any claim they support this guy.