Secret Service Warned Capitol Police Of Threat The Day Before Insurrection

Police intervenes as President Donald Trump’s supporters breach security and enter the Capitol building in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021. (Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The Secret Service on January 5 warned the U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) of a threat to commit violence at the upcoming Trump rally in D.C. the next day, which ultimately led to the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection.

A redacted email obtained by government watchdog organization Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) shows the Secret Service informing the USCP of a “possible officer safety issue for 1/6/21” on January 5.

“Per our Denver Field Office, a concerned citizen reported that [redacted] were flying into BWI today to attend tomorrow’s rally and ‘incite violence.’ In addition, the source reports that [redacted] previously made threats against President-Elect Biden,” the Secret Service wrote.

The email noted that the citizen reported that the subjects were driving to D.C. with “ballistic helmets, armored gloves and vests, rifles, and suppressors.”

“The subjects claimed that they are in the area to protest election fraud, support President Trump, and acknowledged the possibility of violence if approached by counter-protesters,” the Secret Service wrote.

A separate redacted email obtained by CREW that circulated within the Secret Service on January 5 shows the agency acknowledging “multiple” online threats vowing to commit violence against Capitol police on the day of the upcoming Trump rally.

In the email, an unnamed official at the Secret Service’s Protective Intelligence Division flagged a series of threatening posts on Parler declaring that “Its [sic] time the DC Police get their ass whooped for being traitors in our nations [sic] capitol,” that “DC Police are the enemy of the people. No mercy to them on the 6th,” and other similarly violent anti-law enforcement posts.

The official sent the email to the Secret Service’s Protective Intelligence Operations Center and apparently Open Source Unit, per Politico, which was the first outlet to report the documents obtained by CREW.

The official requested that the email recipients “please forward to the necessary entities,” but it is unclear if they did so or if it was sent to the USCP.

The Secret Service declined to comment, citing “pending litigation.” The USCP did not respond to TPM’s inquiry.

The Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 saw a pro-Trump mob quickly overwhelm police officers at the scene, dozens of whom were bludgeoned or otherwise injured by the attackers.

The USCP has blamed its weak response to the siege on lack of intel, saying that the agency was not warned of the sheer magnitude of the potential violence that exploded that day.

Read the emails below:

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

TPM Staff
Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: