SCOTUS Grudgingly Issues First-Ever Ethics Codes To Clear Up ‘Misunderstanding’

Non-enforceable code comes after ProPublica revealed that Justices Thomas, Alito received luxury trips from right-wing billionaires.
Washington, DC - October 7 : Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group photo following the recent addition of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, at the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill on Friday, Oct 0... Washington, DC - October 7 : Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group photo following the recent addition of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, at the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill on Friday, Oct 07, 2022 in Washington, DC. Bottom row, from left, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court on Monday released a code of conduct laying out ethical rules for its nine Justices after nearly a year of revelations of unreported luxury trips, gifts, and secret real estate deals at the high court.

All nine justices signed onto the code, which does not have an enforcement mechanism.

In a brief statement prefacing the new rules, the court admitted that the lack of a code had led “to the misunderstanding that the Justices of this Court, unlike all other jurists in this country, regard themselves as unrestricted by any ethics rules.”

Nonprofit newsroom ProPublica ran a series of blockbuster exposes this year revealing how Justice Clarence Thomas received multiple luxury vacations across a span of 20 years from billionaire Harlan Crow without properly disclosing them. Another report detailed how Justice Samuel Alito hopped on a private jet paid for by GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer en route to a remote Alaska fishing vacation, also without disclosing it.

Those reports, along with other revelations and a Senate Judiciary Committee investigation into ethical violations at the high court, upped pressure on the high court to, at the very least, adopt an ethics code laying out the rules by which its justices should abide.

All nine justices pushed back on the Senate investigation in an April joint statement, reiterating its position that, even without a code, the court abides by the ethical rules which apply to the entire federal judiciary.

Justice Alito pushed further in July, saying that he believed Congress lacked the authority to impose a ethical code on the court.

On Monday, the justices dismissed criticism in the statement as a “misunderstanding” that any of them held themselves to a different standard than that of the rest of the federal judiciary.

“To dispel this misunderstanding, we are issuing this Code, which largely represents a codification of principles that we have long regarded as governing our conduct,” the statement reads.

Read the code here:

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: