SCOTUS Closes Door On Emoluments Question

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11:  The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.  (Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post)
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11: The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11: The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. (Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court declared emoluments cases against former President Trump moot on Monday, closing the door for now to the long-running and unresolved question of whether it was constitutional for the former President to reap profits from his businesses while in office.

The move marks a victory for Trump, who countered lawsuits and investigations into his personal finances by dragging out the process as long as possible.

In the emoluments cases, which alleged that President Trump violated a constitutional provision banning the receipt of profits from foreign government officials, the courts handled the matters at a glacial pace. The three lawsuits alleging that Trump violated the clause, one brought by the D.C. and Maryland attorneys general, were filed in 2017.

The Supreme Court’s decision also allows questions about the Emoluments clause of the Constitution to remain unresolved. Various appellate and districts courts differed over whether Trump’s continued ownership of his D.C. hotel constituted a violation.

Earlier presidents had given up business interests, with Jimmy Carter famously divesting from his lucrative Georgia peanut farm before entering the White House.

But the failure to address lingering questions over whether the Emoluments clause bans private profit from foreign governments while in office means that the question will remain unresolved for any future President who enters office with substantial private business interests.

Correction: This story has been corrected to reflect that Jimmy Carter’s peanut farm was worth a significant amount.
Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. The Trump regime and his dishonest AG Bill Barr obstructed and stalled while Don the Con and his crooked grifter family repeatedly violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution. The Supreme Court now has affirmed this strategy. This renders the emoluments clause to be a legal nullity when a corrupt future president blatantly violates it.

    This cynical decision is exactly why the right wing Supreme Court is awful.

  2. Time for some new more Constitution oriented SC Justices!

  3. Avatar for tsp tsp says:

    SCOTUS just nullified the entire purpose of the Emoluments Clause.

  4. Another opportunity wasted by our glacial and inept court system. They wasted no time in executing people of late, though. Odd that!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

149 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for dont Avatar for sniffit Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for schmed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tsp Avatar for eddycollins Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for davidn Avatar for dougsanders Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for bunnyvelour Avatar for n_b Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for JR_in_Mass

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: