SCOTUS Closes Door On Emoluments Question

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11:  The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.  (Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post)
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11: The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 11: The Trump International Hotel located at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. The building that was the Old Post office and Clock Tower was completed in 1899 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. (Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS

The Supreme Court declared emoluments cases against former President Trump moot on Monday, closing the door for now to the long-running and unresolved question of whether it was constitutional for the former President to reap profits from his businesses while in office.

The move marks a victory for Trump, who countered lawsuits and investigations into his personal finances by dragging out the process as long as possible.

In the emoluments cases, which alleged that President Trump violated a constitutional provision banning the receipt of profits from foreign government officials, the courts handled the matters at a glacial pace. The three lawsuits alleging that Trump violated the clause, one brought by the D.C. and Maryland attorneys general, were filed in 2017.

The Supreme Court’s decision also allows questions about the Emoluments clause of the Constitution to remain unresolved. Various appellate and districts courts differed over whether Trump’s continued ownership of his D.C. hotel constituted a violation.

Earlier presidents had given up business interests, with Jimmy Carter famously divesting from his lucrative Georgia peanut farm before entering the White House.

But the failure to address lingering questions over whether the Emoluments clause bans private profit from foreign governments while in office means that the question will remain unresolved for any future President who enters office with substantial private business interests.

Correction: This story has been corrected to reflect that Jimmy Carter’s peanut farm was worth a significant amount.
Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: