In his marathon testimony Wednesday on Capitol Hill, former special counsel Robert Mueller stuck to the facts of his report under intense questioning from Democrats and Republicans alike. His staccato answers did not diverge from his investigatory conclusions, despite the members’ best efforts.
Hearing #1: House Judiciary Committee
A resounding “no” on exoneration
Mueller already said this in his report. But it made it no less striking to hear him answer Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler’s question about whether he exonerated the President from obstruction with a resounding “no.”
Nadler: “Did you actually totally exonerate the President?”
Mueller: “No.” pic.twitter.com/jxQyTiF1V7
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Mueller made this same point later on in the proceedings, during questioning by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA).
Lieu: “I’d like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting President?”
Mueller: “That is correct”
Mueller reiterates that OLC decision is reason why he didn’t indict Trump pic.twitter.com/urwwpEWoNb
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Mueller contextualized this answer further in a later exchange with Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA).
Reschenthaler: “Isn’t it true, Mr. Mueller, that on page one of volume two, you state when quoting the statute that you had the obligation to either prosecute or not prosecute?”
Mueller: “Generally, that’s the case. Although, most cases are not done in the context of the President.”
Reschenthaler: “In this case, you made a decision not to prosecute, correct?”
Mueller: “No, we made a decision not to decide whether to prosecute or not.”
Mueller contextualizes OLC statute/prosecution decision pic.twitter.com/CIilCe6cvi
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
GOP strategy: talk as fast as humanly possible
The Republican members of the committee seemed less intent on getting Mueller’s answers to their questions than to sprint through long blocks of questions to try to trip him up, or make him look slow. When he paused, or asked for clarification, the members tended to remind him of their time restraints and answer the question themselves.
This exchange with Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) is typical of the dynamic:
This exchange between Mueller and Ratcliffe is typical of the GOP dynamic so far into the Judiciary Committee pic.twitter.com/rUqehB0HgD
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Democrats, for their part, were speaking at a fast clip so as to maximize their limited time, but not railroading Mueller to the same extent.
Mueller shuts down questions about why he investigated in first place
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) tried to score points on why Mueller investigated Trump in the first place if he was never going to indict the President.
Mueller directed him to the Office of Legal Counsel’s own guidance, that he can carry out an investigation, even if he can’t indict a sitting President.
“You don’t know where the investigation is going to lie, and OLC opinion itself says that you can continue the investigation even though you are not going to indict the President,” Mueller said.
Sensenbrenner called the investigation “fishing.”
Mueller defends his investigation, even without ability to indict sitting President, under the OLC’s own policy pic.twitter.com/1B95cfFIE3
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Mueller said that he did not meet with Trump as a candidate for FBI director
In the first bit of new information in the hearing, Mueller said that he did not meet with Trump in a job interview for FBI director, but to discuss other possible candidates.
Mueller says he was NOT a candidate when he met with Trump about the FBI director position pic.twitter.com/kkUhi23ATp
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Trump denies this and has been long spinning the interview to paint Mueller as harboring bitterness towards him.
It has been reported that Robert Mueller is saying that he did not apply and interview for the job of FBI Director (and get turned down) the day before he was wrongfully appointed Special Counsel. Hope he doesn’t say that under oath in that we have numerous witnesses to the…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 24, 2019
Mueller defends his “fair” and “thorough” report
The mild-mannered special counsel briefly came to his report’s defense, as Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) said that Mueller dropped his “political case” in a “paper sack” on their porch, lit it on fire and “ran.”
“I don’t think you reviewed a report that is as thorough, as fair, as consistent as the report that we have in front of us,” Mueller responded.
Mueller defends his “fair” and “thorough” report pic.twitter.com/YPuc0jdIOc
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
He also vouched for one of his fellow attorneys, Andrew Weissmann, in the course of the hearing, calling him “one of the more talented attorneys we have on board.”
Hearing #2: House Intel Committee
Cleanup on aisle OLC
Mueller opened his second appearance of the day by cleaning up the interaction with Lieu flagged above, when he answered affirmatively that he didn’t indict Trump because of OLC guidance.
“As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime,” he clarified.
Mueller cleans up morning exchange with Lieu about OLC policy pic.twitter.com/DgY8v0bmSY
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Mueller confirms that accepting foreign dirt is potentially criminal
When asked by Rep. Jim Hines (D-CT) if a campaign should report offers of foreign dirt, he said that it “should be, can be, depending on the circumstances, a crime.”
Mueller on potential criminality of accepting foreign dirt pic.twitter.com/IVvQzi8q90
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
Mueller decisively agrees that Manafort shared polling information with Russian/Ukrainian oligarchs
In perhaps the strongest terms we’ve heard yet, Mueller definitively agrees that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort shared campaign and polling information with Konstantin Kilimnik and Oleg Deripaska for money.
I’ve never seen this stated so definitively, that Manafort shared campaign and polling data with Kilimnik because he hoped to get paid money by Russian or Ukrainian oligarchs. pic.twitter.com/qJ43Kc8blJ
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) July 24, 2019
Mueller aide Aaron Zebley was sworn in…for nothing
Despite all the hoopla Republicans raised over Aaron Zebley’s inclusion in the proceedings as a sworn-in witness who could field some of the committee members’ questions, he didn’t utter a word during the hearing.
The cable news channels also cut him out of the split screens, conveying truthfully the reality of the multi-hour session — Mueller was in it alone.
I didn’t expect much, so this is not disappointing. 2020.
Remember the good 'ol days when you could impeach a President over a blowjob…good times, good times.
Certainly shuts down rather definitively some of the bullshittier talking points Trump and his anti-American GOP enablers have flung about. That said, not really much new here.
Sounds to me that Mueller is not so much saying that they decided to not charge Trump because of the OLC rule as that they decided to not even consider charging him because of the rule–whether or not he might or might not have committed otherwise chargeable crimes.
Which, if true, leaves enough wiggle room for Repubs to assert that it’s not true that they didn’t charge Trump solely because of the rule, but rather also because there wasn’t any evidence supporting such charges. Which would be BS, of course, but that never stopped Repubs from asserting anything.
Dems have to go all-out with the assertion that but for the OLC rule Trump would have been charged, given the evidence of crimes and that Mueller would not exonerate him, which even though also not a slam dunk assertion, is good enough in today’s malleable media climate where spin trumps fact.
Meh.
About what I expected “I refer you to the report” - though I had anticipated chapter and verse of the report. He’s tired.
Honestly, the only hope I have now that the dem’s will ‘lead from behind the polls’ - is for Epstein to cough up something truly salacious regarding Trump and girls and money laundering. With BARR riding to Trump’s rescue - even that seems unlikely.