Report: Observers Of GOP’s Sketchy Arizona Election Audit Required To Sign NDAs

PHOENIX, AZ - MAY 01: Contractors working for Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate, examine and recount ballots from the 2020 general election at Veterans Memorial Coliseum on May 1, 2021 in Phoeni... PHOENIX, AZ - MAY 01: Contractors working for Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate, examine and recount ballots from the 2020 general election at Veterans Memorial Coliseum on May 1, 2021 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Maricopa County ballot recount comes after two election audits found no evidence of widespread fraud. (Photo by Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Volunteer observers of the GOP’s shady “audit” of Maricopa County, Arizona’s 2020 election results are being required to sign non-disclosure agreements, local station ABC 15 reported Tuesday night. 

An unnamed volunteer told ABC 15 that all observers were being required to sign the document by Cyber Ninjas, the lead contractor for the audit. The so-called audit, which has faced legal challenges and criticisms over lack of transparency and poor logisticswas initiated by Arizona’s GOP-controlled state senate.

“I agree that unless I am authorized in writing by Cyber Ninjas, Inc. and the Arizona State Senate, I will not disclose any Confidential Information to any person who is not conducting the Audit,” the non-disclosure agreement reportedly reads in part.

The document also purports to restrict observers from making “public statements, social media posts, or similar public disclosures” about the audit without authorization, or until after the audit’s results are public. 

The document notes potential “legal consequences” including punitive damages for violating the agreement.

A spokesperson for Cyber Ninjas did not respond to TPM’s request for comment on ABC 15’s report. 

Cyber Ninjas has fought in court to keep information about the audit private. A judge’s order last week forced the company to produce documents outlining its policies and practices for the review.

Critics have focused on the audit’s lack of transparency: Journalists are forced to operate as a “pool” — only one reporter, photojournalist, and videographer at a time — and their movements are restricted within the audit venue.

Initially, reporters were required to work as observers if they wanted to see the audit first-hand. One reporter who volunteered as an observer, The Arizona Republic’s Jen Fifield, noted on Twitter that she was not required to sign an NDA as part of that volunteer work. 

The audit has been tagged by suspicion and allegations of conflict of interest from the start: Doug Logan, CEO of Cyber Ninjas, boosted false conspiracy theories about the 2020 election on a since-deleted Twitter account, and last year he worked with others “on the investigation into election fraud” at the home of the fringe pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood, Wood confirmed to TPM.

The audit is also accepting private donations, which have been raised by the likes of Wood, ex-Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne, and One America News anchor Christina Bobb. OAN is the Senate-approved live-streaming broadcaster of the audit.

Donald Trump’s supporters and the former president himself have spoken openly about the audit having the potential to reinvigorate bogus fraud claims and calls for audits elsewhere, like Michigan and Georgia.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Report: Observers Of GOP’s Sketchy Arizona Election Audit Required To Sign NDAs

    That alone is grounds for total disqualification for consideration of their “results”.

    Don’t pay any attention to the man behind the curtain.

  2. Sign a non disclosure agreement while you are trying to disclose voter fraud.

  3. Can someone (perhaps on the ground in Arizona) explain why the [supposedly impartial] judge(s) have not yet put a stop to this farce?

  4. So, not only do the reactionaries want to control who recounts the vote, they also want to control whoever witnesses it.
    Totally transparent, until you get to the part the reactionaries want to make opaque: the actual process of counting.
    What could be untrustworthy about that?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

193 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajm Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for yskov Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for cgrutherford Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for justruss Avatar for godwit Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for chjim Avatar for garrybee Avatar for osprey Avatar for randome Avatar for old_guru Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: