READ: Special Adviser For Ukraine Negotiations Was Wary Of Politicized Policy

Catherine Croft (L), a specialist on Ukraine with the State Department leaves after a closed-door deposition at the US Capitol in Washington, DC on October 30, 2019. - US President Trump is accused by Democrats of wi... Catherine Croft (L), a specialist on Ukraine with the State Department leaves after a closed-door deposition at the US Capitol in Washington, DC on October 30, 2019. - US President Trump is accused by Democrats of withholding military aid to compel Ukraine to mount an embarrassing corruption probe against Biden -- in other words using US foreign policy for his personal political benefit.Trump dismisses the case as cooked up, but Congressional investigators have heard a steady flow of damaging evidence.After interviewing 10 witnesses behind closed doors over the past five weeks, Democrats have drawn up rules for the next stage of the impeachment inquiry that will include public hearings.The White House dismissed the process October 29, 2019 as a "sham," claiming that the Democrats were refusing its basic due process rights. The House vote could take place before or shortly after the New Year. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House impeachment inquiry on Monday released a transcript of the testimony of Catherine Croft, special adviser for Ukraine negotiations and a former aide to then-U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker.

Croft testified that she was “trepidatious” about the politicization of Ukraine policy, and concerned that “the Trump administration would choose to change its policy to suit domestic politics.”

Prior to working with Volker, Croft worked on the National Security Council for a year starting in mid-2017. There, she said, she received multiple calls from former Rep. Bob Livingston (R-LA), now a lobbyist who was pressing the administration to fire then-Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. Livingston described the ambassador as an Obama holdover and “associated with George Soros,” Croft testified. Yovanovitch was ultimately recalled in May 2019 due to a smear campaign led by Rudy Giuliani, who used similar attacks.

Croft also testified regarding White House holds on Ukraine military assistance. She said she was “very surprised” when two Ukrainian embassy officials contacted her about the military aid to Ukraine that the White House held up. “They found out very early or much earlier than I expected them to” about the hold, Croft said, though she didn’t remember the exact date she met with the diplomats.

Croft identified another, earlier hold that originated in the White House budget office in late 2017 or early 2018, on a delivery of Javelin missiles to Ukraine. Budget director (and now-White House chief of staff) Mick Mulvaney raised concerns about “the Russian reaction” to the provision. The objection itself was unusual, Croft testified, given the office’s focus on budget matters. The hold lasted a week or two, Croft said. Eventually, she and a colleague briefed Mulvaney on the decision to deliver the Javelins, and the hold was lifted “within a day or two.”

Read Croft’s testimony here, or below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Dictatorships do this all the tyme…

    What’s the problem?

  2. Not being that smart, I am starting to believe the Republicans are bad people.:grimacing:

  3. “Livingston described the ambassador as an Obama holdover and ‘associated with George Soros’.”

    The GOP should just come right out and accuse the entire impeachment effort of being a Jewish cabal.

  4. I’ve given up on the 30% of donnie diehards in this country. I just hope that the middle 20% will really pay attention to these testimonies.

    It is SO obvious how warped, twisted and ILLEGAL the machinations of this badministration has been toward Ukraine.

  5. Oooh, there’s a nugget…Mulvaney thought that being OMB director gave him the ability to stop payments for anything that he questioned. I wonder how many times he has used that policy that we haven’t heard about…it doesn’t sound like part of the job of OMB to stop Congressional funding due to political considerations. That digs his hole a bit deeper, he really deserves some punishment for his abuse of power.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for footballreddog Avatar for economides Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for drriddle Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for sanni Avatar for musgrove Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for junebug Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for capital2 Avatar for uneducated Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for communistagronomist Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: