Paul Indicates He’ll Vote Against Trump’s Emergency, Forcing President’s First Veto

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 12: Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., stands as President Donald Trump arrives to sign an executive order on health care in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, Oct. 12, ... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 12: Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., stands as President Donald Trump arrives to sign an executive order on health care in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, Oct. 12, 2017. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS

Sen. Rand Paul indicated Saturday night that he would join three other Republican senators in voting against President Donald Trump’s declaration of emergency to secure more funds for a border wall, likely forcing Trump to use his veto power for the first time if he wants the emergency declaration to stay in place.

“I can’t vote to give the president the power to spend money that hasn’t been appropriated by Congress,” Paul said at the Southern Kentucky Lincoln Day Dinner on Saturday, as quoted by the Bowling Green Daily News.

“We may want more money for border security, but Congress didn’t authorize it. If we take away those checks and balances, it’s a dangerous thing.”

Paul’s vote against Trump’s declaration — combined with Democratic senators’ votes and the votes of Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Thom Tillis (R-NC), who’ve also said they’ll vote to defy the President — would constitute a 51-vote majority, and means the President will be forced to veto Congress’ move to reverse his declaration.

Trump has said he will veto the resolution, should it arrive on his desk. The House of Representatives, with 232 Democrats and 13 Republicans in favor, voted to advance a resolution against Trump’s emergency declaration on Tuesday. The Senate has yet to vote on the measure.

H/t Politico

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: