Portman: IRS Provision Off The Table In Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan After GOP Outcry

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 09: Ranking member Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) questions Neera Tanden, nominee for Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Homeland S... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 09: Ranking member Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) questions Neera Tanden, nominee for Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs committee on February 9, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. Tanden helped found the Center for American Progress, a policy research and advocacy organization and has held senior advisory positions in Democratic politics since the Clinton administration. (Photo by Leigh Vogel-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), who serves as the lead GOP negotiation for the bipartisan infrastructure proposal, on Sunday said that lawmakers have ditched increased IRS enforcement as a way to fund the nearly $1 trillion package.

During an interview on CNN, Portman indicated that the decision to nix the IRS enforcement proposal came after “pushback” from fellow Republicans.

“Well, one reason it’s not part of the proposal is that we did have pushback. Another reason is that we found out that the Democrats were going to put a proposal into the reconciliation package, which was not just similar to the one we had, but with a lot more IRS enforcement,” Portman said.

“So that created quite a problem, because the general agreement is that this is the bipartisan negotiated infrastructure package, and that we will stick with that,” Portman added.

Portman’s remarks come as no surprise after the group of bipartisan senators weighed abandoning an effort to raise revenue for the roughly $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure agreement through enhanced enforcement at the IRS, following Republicans’ skepticism over granting the tax agency new power. The IRS provision had been estimated to bring in an estimated $100 billion over 10 years and would target taxpayers who dodge income taxes.

The decision to nix IRS enforcement from the bipartisan infrastructure bill signals that the group of lawmakers behind the proposal will need to find other ways to fund the package.

Portman told CNN that lawmakers are “still negotiating” some “final details with the White House” and that he and other lawmakers on both sides of the aisle would continue having discussions later Sunday.

“Later today, we will be having additional negotiations with the Republicans and Democrats who have come together to put this bill into a track that’s very unusual for Washington,” Portman said.

Portman also dismissed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) announcement of setting an “arbitrary” deadline on Wednesday for a procedural vote on the bipartisan infrastructure deal. Schumer also set Wednesday as the deadline for Democrats to “move forward” on a budget reconciliation resolution with a $3.5 trillion topline in spending.

“Chuck Schumer, with all due respect, is not writing the bill, nor is Mitch McConnell,” Portman said. “So that’s why we shouldn’t have an arbitrary deadline of Wednesday. We should bring the legislation forward when it’s ready.”

Watch Portman’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Republicans are opposed to requiring people & businesses to pay the taxes they owe. But we knew that

  2. So Republicans don’t want the IRS to enforce the law against tax cheats? Who could have guessed? In other news, it turns out that water is still wet.

  3. Just the rich ones.

  4. IRS Provision Off The Table In Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan After Wealthy Donor Outcry

  5. … the Democrats were going to put a proposal into the reconciliation package, which was not just similar to the one we had, but with a lot more IRS enforcement,” Portman said.

    Making sure people and corporations pay isn’t really gone. It’ll be there in the reconciliation bill.
    Which leaves the bipartisan negotiators with a real problem: where are they gonna find the fluffy pay fors they’re using to avoid raising taxes?
    I don’t think they exist; so, come Wednesday, the desirable parts of this bills are gonna get rolled into the reconciliation package and passed that way.
    Not that there was ever reliable reactionary support for a bill that wouldn’t still be under negotiation in January.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

142 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for greylady Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for dryheat Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tsp Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for stellermeller Avatar for maximus Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for bcgister Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Scoutmom

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: