Poll: Foreign Policy No Longer Obama Strength

FILE - In a Dec. 31, 2012, file photo President Barack Obama pauses as he speaks in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. When President Barack Obama speaks at the University at Buffalo Thur... FILE - In a Dec. 31, 2012, file photo President Barack Obama pauses as he speaks in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. When President Barack Obama speaks at the University at Buffalo Thursday Aug. 22, 2013, about making college more affordable, supporters of an innovative scholarship program are hoping for a plug. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, file) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Foreign policy used to be a bright spot in Americans’ dimming opinion of President Barack Obama. Not anymore. Associated Press-GfK polling found a spring and summer of discontent with the president’s handling of world events.

Obama’s consistently low marks across crises such as the fighting in Ukraine and the conflict between Israel and Hamas could benefit Republicans aiming to win control Congress in the fall.

“The problem is saying something and not doing anything — making grandiose threats and never following any of them up,” said Dwight Miller, 71, a retiree and volunteer firefighter in Robertson County, Texas. Miller, who describes himself as a libertarian-leaning Republican, says Obama should either stay out of other nations’ business or commit to going “all in.”

In Hawaii, another retiree, Kent Killam, also worries about the U.S. response to cascading troubles in Ukraine, the Middle East and elsewhere. But he blames former President George W. Bush for eroding the nation’s clout abroad and Republican lawmakers for limiting Obama’s ability to act.

“I’m not saying it’s going well at all,” said Killam, 72, a Democratic-leaning independent. “On the other hand, I don’t think he has too many options.”

The foreign conflicts that have consumed so much of Washington’s attention lately aren’t rated as especially pressing by most Americans surveyed for the AP-GfK poll. It’s unclear how their unhappiness with Obama’sperformance will affect the midterm elections in November.

Asked about world trouble spots:

—42 percent say the conflict between Israel and Hamas is “very” or “extremely” important to them; 60 percent disapprove of the way Obama has handled it.

—40 percent consider the situation in Afghanistan highly important; 60 percent disapprove of Obama’shandling of it.

—38 percent give high importance to the conflict in Ukraine; 57 percent disapprove of what Obama has done about that.

—38 percent find the situation in Iraq of pressing importance; 57 percent disapprove of Obama’s handling of it.

Opinion of Obama’s foreign policy has slid nearly as low as his overall approval rating.

Just 43 percent were OK with the president’s handling of foreign relations in the new poll, while 40 percent approved how he’s doing his job overall. AP-GfK polls in March and May show a similar picture.

The late-March poll, which came after Russia seized upon an uprising in Ukraine to annex the Crimean Peninsula, marked a significant drop from January’s 49 percent foreign policy rating. In September 2012, shortly before Obama’s re-election, it was 57 percent.

Republicans line up more uniformly behind their party on foreign policy than Democrats do.

Asked whom they trust more to protect the country, 71 percent of Republicans chose their party. Only 39 percent of Democrats said their party most; about as many Democrats trusted both parties equally.

Sixty-three percent of Republicans have more confidence in their party in an international crisis, while 44 percent of Democrats put faith in their party alone. Most Democrats did prefer their party for managing the U.S. image abroad — 51 percent said it would handle that better.

About half of independents don’t trust either major party in a world crisis.

“I think they’re both a little bit more aggressive than they need to be in using armies instead of going through the U.N.,” said Cameron Wooley, 18, of Orlando, Florida, who’s still deciding whom to support when she votes for the first time this year.

“Maybe if we didn’t spend these massive chunks of our budget on the military we wouldn’t have the other concerns we have because of money,” Wooley said. An aspiring opera singer attending the University of North Florida in the fall, she would like to see some of that defense money handed over to the states to spend on things like education and roads.

Only about half of those polled see foreign relations as highly important right now, and concern about the United States’ relationship with other countries hasn’t increased despite recent news.

Jay Lofstead, a Democrat in Albuquerque, New Mexico, wants to see more involvement in the world’s problems, and he gives Obama a mixed review.

“I’d like to see him get more involved on a humanitarian basis in more areas, not military support — no financial support, no weapons — but strictly humanitarian aid,” said Lofstead, 44, a supercomputer researcher at Sandia National Laboratories, who stressed that he speaks only for himself.

The AP-GfK Poll was conducted July 24-28, 2014, using KnowledgePanel, GfK’s probability-based online panel designed to be representative of the U.S. population. It involved online interviews with 1,044 adults, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points for all respondents. It is larger for subgroups.

Respondents were first selected randomly using phone or mail survey methods, and were later interviewed online. People selected for KnowledgePanel who didn’t otherwise have access to the Internet were provided with the ability to access the Internet at no cost to them.

___

Online:

AP-GfK Poll: http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. How disappointing. It’s been six years and still he hasn’t gotten us into a war. Not even one. What a failure!

  2. This is an AP poll. Need I say more. If his polling has gone down on this blame it on the media, who are not liberal by the way, who scream day and night about how the US is not going to war over things that the US has zero control over. DUH!

  3. What? You mean a country with four percent of the world’s population doesn’t get to run the entire world and manipulate a million variables in engineering an outcome that we want?

    This is some bullshit. Obama can’t just dress up like Green Lantern, point his magic ring at the Middle East, and fix it all? I watched “Super Friends” when I was seven years old, and this was promised to me.

    And don’t give me any of this “complexity” crap. This is America. We’re awesome. And we get whatever we want right here and right now and with sprinkles on top and anyone who thinks otherwise hates Jesus.

  4. Very interesting to see what an 18 year-old “undecided” (can’t blame her – I wasn’t a political news junkie the summer before college) wants to see happen. Neither party really advocates for taking a big chunk of the DOD budget and putting it toward other domestic services, but if that’s the way young voters and swing voters trend, maybe we can start a conversation.

    If we could zero balance budget the Pentagon one time it would shake loose hundreds of billions of dollars.

  5. Miller, who describes himself as a libertarian-leaning Republican, says Obama should either stay out of other nations’ business or commit to going “all in.”

    Another ignorant Tea-Tard thinks he’s qualified to judge the POTUS’s foreign policy. Libertarian-leaning Republicans have their heads far up their asses.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for glblank Avatar for thunderhawk Avatar for javaman Avatar for rssrai Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for LoganFive Avatar for maescott

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: