PA Supreme Court OKs Ballot Drop Boxes, Postmark Deadlines, In Win For Dems

At the Berks County Office of Election Services in the Berks County Services Building in Reading, PA Thursday morning September 3, 2020 where they are processing applications for mail-in ballots.
Reading, PA - September 3: A blank application for Mail-in Ballot with some of the applications that were already received. At the Berks County Office of Election Services in the Berks County Services Building in Rea... Reading, PA - September 3: A blank application for Mail-in Ballot with some of the applications that were already received. At the Berks County Office of Election Services in the Berks County Services Building in Reading, PA Thursday morning September 3, 2020 where they are processing applications for mail-in ballots. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Trump’s crusade against ballot drop boxes and other absentee voting practices that make the process easier was dealt a major setback Thursday with a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that permitted policies that will facilitate mail-in voting.

The court’s decision greenlighted the use of ballot drop boxes at locations other than county elections offices, and it said that ballots received in the three days after the Nov. 3 election could still be counted if they were postmarked by Election Day.

The case was brought in state court by Democrats as a way to head-off a federal lawsuit the Trump campaign had filed targeting the expanded use of drop boxes. Additionally, the state Supreme Court upheld Pennsylvania’s requirement that poll watchers be from the county where they’re staffed — another policy the Trump campaign is aiming to reverse in its federal case.

The judge in the federal case, a Trump-appointee, put the Republican lawsuit on hold while the Democratic lawsuit in state court was litigated.

The Democrats did not get everything they wanted with the state Supreme Court decision issued Thursday. The Court denied the Dems’ request that election officials be required to provide an opportunity for absentee voters to fix deficiencies on their ballots. It also okayed the rejection of mail-in ballots that were missing a secrecy ballot, an approach Democrats oppose.

Earlier Thursday, the state Supreme Court ruled that the Green Party’s presidential candidate would not be included on November’s ballot, because the party did not comply with the state’s rules for submitting the candidate for ballot placement. The resolution of that dispute will allow Pennsylvania election officials to begin sending out mail-in ballots.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. And who is going to make sure that a Trumpturd doesn’t drop an incendiary device?

  2. Great! I was beginning to think this day held only bat shit crazy news re: Donnie and his toadies.

  3. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    Glad to see this, but this issue really was kind of a no-brainer.

  4. So now the Fed trumper will just decide he’s taking it back in court and over-ruling.

  5. Awesome. Saves me some trouble. Voted this way in the primary and the county set up extra boxes including one just on the other side of town. Easy-peasy. Oh, and fuck you, Trump. We’re gonna blue-wall your ass like the old days, don’t worry.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

51 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jam97 Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for sooner Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for docmoore Avatar for becca656 Avatar for alansnipes734 Avatar for gr Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for caltg Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for j.dave Avatar for burningquestions Avatar for uneducated Avatar for stevecoh1 Avatar for godwit Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: