Pelosi: McConnell Receptive To 1/6 Commission Until He ‘Dumped All Over’ It On Senate Floor

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 19: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Thursday put the blame squarely on Republicans as to why progress has stalled on a commission to investigate the January 6 Capitol attack.

When she initially approached Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), she said, he seemed receptive.

“When I asked him if he was serious about wanting to do this he said ‘yes, it depends on the scope,’ and I said ‘well let’s discuss that,'” she said at a press conference. “The next morning he went to the floor and just dumped all over — forgive my crudeness — the fact that we would be investigating January 6.”

She said that as recently as last week, she put out feelers to see what can be done with bipartisan support. 

“Some of them have been receptive but then they’ll say ‘well, leadership doesn’t want us to do anything,'” she said of Republicans. 

The process to draw up a commission has stalled, as Republicans balked at Pelosi’s initial proposal giving Democrats more commissioner slots and imbuing the commission with a broad scope to include the lead-up to the attack itself.

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) shrugged off the need for a commission last weekend, saying on NBC that Congress could just investigate itself.

“The Congress itself has the capacity here to move forward,” he said. “That doesn’t mean I’m opposed to a commission, but frankly, I would believe that commission would probably be a reason to wait and not do the things that we know we need to do right now.”

Pelosi too suggested that parts of the insurrection fall under various committees’ jurisdictions. She said cryptically that there are “other paths” to completing an investigation if partisan headwinds are too strong for a bipartisan 9/11-style commission to come together.

She encouraged reporters to focus on the question of scope, and Republicans’ issues with it, as the central problem holding up the commission. McConnell has already expressed that if Democrats insist on an expanded scope potentially including former President Donald Trump and his GOP allies’ conspiracy theories that catalyzed the attack, he’ll push a focus on Black Lives Matter protesters and antifa. 

If the commission were set up, the accountability question would likely force a partisan divide there too, though some — including Phil Angelides, chair of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission — have said that it’s still worth doing. 

“We have to find the truth and we will,” Pelosi said. “We’re not walking away from that.” 

She started to say that she was optimistic, before correcting herself — “I’m persistent,” she said instead.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Gee, one wonders what they are worried that such an investigation will find.

  2. McConnell has already expressed that if Democrats insist on an expanded scope potentially including former President Donald Trump and his GOP allies’ conspiracy theories that catalyzed the attack, he’ll push a focus on Black Lives Matter protesters and antifa.

    Let him! Seriously, let him keep pushing the idea that BLM is some kind of terrorist group and that Antifa is an organized arm of the Democratic Party. Not only isn’t it true, anybody who believes that is already voting solidly Republican. So much of their race-baiting nonsense does nothing more than confirm what their base already believes and it only serves to make them crazier.

  3. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) shrugged off the need for a commission last weekend, saying on NBC that Congress could just investigate itself.

    The Senator from Misery Missouri can go investigate himself, too. To be Blunt about it.

  4. Caught an interview with one of the 9/11 commission members on NPR a few days ago but I can’t seem to dig up the correct link now. The gist of what he said was “there were lots of nutty conspiracy theories about 9/11, and far from steering clear of them – we welcomed them, properly investigated them, and then conclusively documented why they were nonsense, in the public record.”

    That’s how you do it. So the 1/6 investigation absolutely should look into, for example, whether the violence was an AntiFa false flag op. And include the angry testimony from the RWNJs who were actually on site, demanding full “credit” for their actions.

  5. I don’t know why Pelosi is still pushing for this. A 1/6 Commission with Dem majority won’t be perceived as fair and un-biased. Meanwhile, no Republican will support investigation of the lead-up to the insurrection because it directly involves the former (and still) leader of the Republican party. This isn’t 9/11 where the threat was outside the investigating body.

    It would be meaningless without a discussion of Trump’s Big Lie about election fraud that started it all off, and that will never be allowed to happen in a “bipartisan” Congressional investigation.

    Just forget it. Everyone knows what happened and why. Let the history books tell the story of what happened, after every Republican now in Congress is dead and buried, and can’t fight it any longer.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for robg Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for ghost Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for cervantes Avatar for dont Avatar for go2goal Avatar for apotropoxy Avatar for pine Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for pshah Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for tsp Avatar for modelman Avatar for caltg Avatar for brian512 Avatar for prometheus_bic Avatar for socalista Avatar for sydneyp22 Avatar for inthesedays Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for gargoyle Avatar for n_b Avatar for Stay-on-Target

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: