Pelosi Ups Pressure On Thomas Recusal: ‘I Don’t Think He Should’ve Ever Been Appointed’

US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, speaks during her weekly press conference at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2022. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP v... US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, speaks during her weekly press conference at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2022. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Thursday took congressional Democrats’ demands for Justice Clarence Thomas’ recusal from Jan. 6-related cases up a notch, following revelations of his wife’s pro-coup texts.

Speaking to reporters during a press conference on Thursday, Pelosi didn’t mince words when asked whether she agrees with members of her caucus calling for Justice Thomas’ resignation now that the extent of his wife’s involvement in Trump’s election subversion efforts has been revealed.

“I don’t think he should’ve ever been appointed,” Pelosi said, before saying that she wouldn’t directly address some of her colleagues’ calls for Justice Thomas’ resignation.

Pelosi, however, urged the House to pass a standalone bill to impose a code of ethics on Supreme Court justices.

“They have no code of ethics and — really? It’s the Supreme Court of the United States,” Pelosi said. “They’re making judgments about the air we breathe and we don’t even know what their ethical standard is?”

“Why should they have lower standards than members of Congress?” Pelosi continued.

Pelosi then argued that Ginni Thomas’ damning pro-coup texts to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election demonstrates Justice Thomas’ lack of “ethical standards.”

“I hear people say from time to time, ‘well, it’s a personal decision of a judge as to whether he should recuse himself,” Pelosi said. “Well if your wife is an admitted and proud contributor to a coup of our country, maybe you should weigh that in your ethical standards.”

A growing number of Democrats in recent days have called for Justice Thomas’ recusal in light of his wife’s explosive texts in which she relentlessly urged Meadows find a way to overturn the election results and “release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down.”

Some Democrats went further, however, demanding that the justice resign altogether, pointing to Ginni Thomas’ longtime conservative activism, the extent of which has only recently been revealed. Democrats and many legal scholars agree her activism poses potential conflicts of interest for her husband as he hears cases related to last year’s deadly Capitol insurrection and efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.

On the other side of the aisle, GOP senators in recent days have largely avoided engaging with calls for Justice Thomas to recuse himself. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has maintained his defense of Justice Thomas, characterizing calls for his recusal from election cases as part of an “inappropriate pressure campaign” by Democrats.

Watch Pelosi’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Knowing Pelosi, I am awed, interested and cheering.

  2. Avatar for noonm noonm says:

    “They have no code of ethics and — really? It’s the Supreme Court of the United States,” Pelosi said. “They’re making judgments about the air we breathe and we don’t even know what their ethical standard is?”

    “I hear people say from time to time, ‘well, it’s a personal decision of a judge as to whether he should recuse himself,” Pelosi said. “Well if your wife is an admitted and proud contributor to a coup of our country, maybe you should weigh that in your ethical standards.”

    She’s not wrong.

    Glad to see Dem leadership call out Robert’s Ethics-optional approach to Supreme Court management.

    Now up the pressure - state now that if Thomas does not recuse himself on the next Jan 6th case in front of the SCOTUS, that will be grounds for impeachment.

  3. Excellent call Madam Speaker!

    Keep speaking truth to the traitors and to America’s enemies.

  4. “I don’t think he should’ve ever been appointed,” Pelosi said …

    … stating the obvious.

    And why hasn’t he suffered any consequences for attempting to hide the millions his looney wife “made” from lobbyists?

  5. Please, everyone, remember this before you compose your next post about the profound naiveté of the Democrats, believing as you suppose they do in the possibility of bipartisanship with today’s GOP. Also the fecklessness of the OIdz. Nancy just said the SOB shouldn’t have been appointed in the first place and asked where the FUCK the SC’s ethical standards are. She’s a warrior queen and she’d be the first one to stab a Nazgul right in his goddamn face. “I am no man!” BOOM

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

90 more replies

Participants

Avatar for zandru Avatar for jw1 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for trnc Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for slagathor Avatar for arrendis Avatar for emjayay Avatar for gr Avatar for billymac Avatar for pshah Avatar for hornblower Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for noonm Avatar for news247 Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for godwit Avatar for philmore Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for geoffreygiraffe Avatar for Hatmama Avatar for JR_in_Mass

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: