DETROIT (AP) — Michigan State Police tried but failed to suspend a trooper for his use of a stun gun months before he fired a Taser at a teenager who crashed an all-terrain vehicle and died, according to records obtained by The Associated Press.
Mark Bessner is charged with murder in the death of Damon Grimes, but it wasn’t his only incident involving a Taser. Details are in personnel documents released to the AP through a public records request.
State police wanted to suspend Bessner for 10 days for firing his Taser twice at a handcuffed man who was running away in 2016. But an arbitrator said there was no “just cause” for discipline.
In 2014, Bessner fired his Taser at a suspect who was handcuffed. He agreed to a five-day suspension, records show, but four days were eventually dropped. It apparently was his first case of misconduct.
Bessner, 43, now faces serious legal trouble. He was charged last week with second-degree murder in the August death of Damon Grimes of Detroit, who was joyriding on an all-terrain vehicle when the trooper fired his stun gun. The 15-year-old crashed and died.
Bessner, who quit the state police after the teenager’s death, has pleaded not guilty and is being held on $1 million bond. Prosecutor Kym Worthy said there was no reason for him to fire his Taser — especially from a moving patrol car.
“His behavior was criminal. We’re not trying to pull the rug over anyone’s eyes,” a state police spokesman, Lt. Mike Shaw, said Tuesday.
Just two months earlier, an arbitrator had cleared Bessner of misconduct in how he used his Taser while chasing a crime suspect. The man was handcuffed during a traffic stop in Detroit but suddenly sprinted away and was able to clear fences.
Bessner believed the man must have slipped out of the cuffs so he used his Taser twice to subdue him. It was a wrong assumption. It’s generally against state policy to use a stun gun on a handcuffed person who’s in custody.
Arbitrator Steven Lett, however, found technical distinctions. He said the man was “no longer in custody” as soon as he ran away.
“The question is whether the officer’s actions are objectively reasonable in light of all the facts and circumstances,” Lett said, quoting a training guide from the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards.
If the 10-day suspension had been affirmed, it would have triggered an additional four days from the 2014 incident that were being held in abeyance, Shaw said.
Bessner’s personnel file shows he faced a third misconduct allegation in March. State police said he was driving at high speed without emergency lights or sirens. The case apparently wasn’t resolved before he quit last fall.
Bessner’s file also includes praise for his work. He was recognized by the department for saving a woman who had overdosed on heroin. “Best wishes for continued success,” Col. Kriste Kibbey Etue wrote in February 2017.
___
This story has been corrected to show that the arbitrator’s decision came two months before the teen’s death, not three.
___
It is good to see the police come out strongly to support criminal charges against the (former) trooper. That is different from Baltimore, where it was the state attorney that brought charges in the death of Freddy Gray. It’s rare for a police force willing to investigate and support the prosecution of one of its own.
On the other hand, after the arbitrator ruled that the then-trooper could not be suspended in an earlier incident, why wasn’t he given a desk job somewhere, so that he would be less of a danger to the public?
Because that too would be a form of punishment and that’s just not to be done to a Cop. The disparate treatment in this case is gobsmacking. The mission of the police is to pick up the trash for punishment. Do you know a Cop that doesn’t believe the public deserves punishment? I don’t. But they don’t believe they do and they hold the strings of the system in their hands. This guy was a recidivist. A menace to society and although he gave ample warning signs the “Cop” factor over road reason and now we have a kid dead.
Tasers are now considered “potentially” lethal weapons. They are to be used only to ensure the safety of officers and members of the public. You can’t shoot a fleeing subject ( SCOTUS ruling ) and I doubt using a taser for that purpose is legal either. The manufacturer of the device claims it’s intended purpose is as an alternative to deadly force. If so the Cop should have been nowhere near an arbitrator for the first taser offense. We don’t arbitrate felonies.
In short he didn’t get a transfer to a desk for the same reason he didn’t get suspended. He’s a Cop.
But it was the command that went after the suspension. And the command has a lot more authority over assignments than over suspension. I don’t know the contract, but if they put him on desk duty, or assigned him to the evidence room, or made him work in the files, that might not be grievable.
Did you hear about the first incident? You sure as heck did the fatal one. That’s why.
Tasers are legalized torture devices. The makers of this torture device will take a coroner to court if that coroner even hints that the taser was the cause of death. So, coroners have all but stopped saying that the taser caused the fatal heart attack, etc. because they can’t afford the legal fees. I’m sure Taser will try like hell to get this guy off because if he’s found guilty there goes their bottom line.
Tasers, sound cannons, non-lethal bullets (yeah, right), pepper spray, and on and on - tools for sick fucks and just like the pedophiles ran to the Catholic church, the sadists all apply to their local police force.