NYT: Video Contradicts Trump Admin’s Claim That Maduro’s Forces Burned Aid Trucks

A video analysis published Sunday by The New York Times contradicts claims by senior Trump administration officials and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) that Venezuelan forces loyal to President Nicolás Maduro were responsible for a fire last month that consumed trucks attempting to carry food into Venezuela.

According to Times’ video analysis, which the paper based on unpublished TV footage, the fire appears to have been the result of a Molotov cocktail thrown from the Colombian side of the Veneuzuela-Colombia border — that is, from the side of protesters attempting to escort the aid supplies across a bridge into Venezuela, rather than from Maduro’s forces on the Venezuelan side of the border.

The Trump administration has for weeks asserted that Juan Guaidó, the leader of the Venezuelan opposition, is the legitimate interim president of Venezuela. The burning trucks provided rhetorical ammunition for the administration’s call for Maduro’s ouster.

Senior Trump officials including National Security Adviser John Bolton, USAID Administrator Mark Green and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed Maduro’s regime was responsible for the fire.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) tweeted that the trucks were “burned by Maduro.”

But the Times’ investigation appears to show that the statements were incorrect.

Responding to the Times, a Rubio spokesperson said “Maduro bears full responsibility for the destruction of humanitarian aid.”

A spokesperson for the National Security Council, which Bolton leads, said: “Maduro is responsible for creating the conditions for violence … His thugs denied the entry of tons of food and medicine, while thousands of courageous volunteers sought to safeguard and deliver aid to Venezuelan families.”

(The Times reported that claims medicine was among the trucks’ cargo are unsubstantiated, as well.)

Watch the Times’ investigation below:

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: