NYT: Atlanta Prosecutor Weighs Criminal Investigation Into Trump For Election Interference

President Donald Trump speaks on the telephone as he answers calls from people calling into the NORAD Santa tracker phone line in the State Dining Room of the White House on December 24, 2018. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Prosecutors in Georgia appear to be closely weighing a criminal investigation into President Trump over his efforts to overturn election results in the state, The New York Times reported late Friday.

The inquiry would be the second known criminal investigation of the President that falls outside of any potential protection from a federal pardon.

The district attorney in Fulton County, which became a key target in Trump’s false narrative over election fraud, is said to be looking into a number of options to address Trump’s meddling in the state’s 2020 presidential election results. People familiar with her office’s discussions told the Times that the top attorney, Fani Willis, is considering hiring a special assistant from outside to oversee the investigation, among other possibilities.

The news comes as David Worley, a Democratic election board member for the state said earlier this week that he would ask the board to make a referral to the Fulton County district attorney by next month.

According to the Times, Worley said that he will ask prosecutors to investigate the now infamous phone call Trump made that sought to pressure Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) to “find” votes to overturn the battleground state’s election results — an effort that many have criticized as a clear violation of state law.

The call to Raffensperger is one of several calls to Georgia Republicans that have been cited as examples of Trump’s efforts to interfere in the Nov. 3 election — other calls were made to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) and later to an elections investigator. 

District attorney spokesman, Jeff DiSantis, told the Times, however, that the office had not moved to hire outside counsel for an investigation on the matter.

But in an interview with the Times, Worley pledged that  if no investigation had been announced by Feb. 10, when the elections board is next scheduled to meet, he would make a motion for the board to refer Trump’s calls to the district attorney’s office an effort that he believes should prompt an investigation.

If the board declines to make a referral, Worley told the Times he would urge Willis himself to open an inquiry. 

Legal experts told the Times that Trump’s calls may have broken at least three state criminal laws, including criminal solicitation to commit election fraud and a related conspiracy charge, which can both be prosecuted as either a felony or a misdemeanor.  A third law that Trump may have breached includes “intentional interference” with another person’s “performance of election duties,” a misdemeanor offense.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Wonder how many other States can and should bring similar charges.

    Actually, I don’t. We know all six of them.

  2. Somehow I doubt that this is what Sidney Powell had in mind when she foretold legal fireworks in Georgia. Krakens, indeed.

  3. Avatar for nh0928 nh0928 says:

    There needs to be a thorough investigation. We likely only know about a fraction of the effort to overturn the GA election results. If crimes occurred, they need to be prosecuted to prevent other attempts from occurring in the future. Why did they make election fraud laws if they aren’t going to enforce them? Collect the information, prosecute if crimes occurred, and let everyone know what happened here.

  4. these headlines are starting to get to me.
    the maybe’s, weighing in, possibly, could be, might be etc.
    it’s a pretty well known fact what the criminals have done.
    fill in the paperwork with the known facts then arrest and prosecute.
    start with trump on the 21st and he will give you all the names you need, as if we couldn’t guess them already.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

211 more replies

Participants

Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for massie Avatar for edhedh Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for justruss Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for tangodancer Avatar for kenga Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for heartflow Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for kovie Avatar for ClutchCargo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: