NYC Delays Return Of Indoor Dining As COVID Cases Surge Across The Country

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 30: Customers dine outside a restaurant on the Upper East Side as New York City moves into Phase 2 of re-opening following restrictions imposed to curb the coronavirus pandemic on June 30, 2... NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 30: Customers dine outside a restaurant on the Upper East Side as New York City moves into Phase 2 of re-opening following restrictions imposed to curb the coronavirus pandemic on June 30, 2020. Phase 2 permits the reopening of offices, in-store retail, outdoor dining, barbers and beauty parlors and numerous other businesses. Phase 2 is the second of four phased stages designated by the state. (Photo by Noam Galai/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said Wednesday that he was delaying the planned resumption of indoor dining at restaurants in the city out of fear it would cause a spike in coronavirus infections.

The mayor, a Democrat, said he was concerned that if the city welcomed diners back into the enclosed spaces of its restaurants, it might experience the same surge in illness now being seen in other states.

“Honestly, even a week ago, honestly, I was hopeful we could. But the news we have gotten from around the country gets worse and worse all the time.”

Outdoor dining at restaurants, which started about two weeks ago, can continue, de Blasio said.

New York City is in the second phase of its reopening plan and is expected to get approval to go to a third phase on July 6.

Under the current rules, large gatherings of people are still banned, but retail stores have been allowed to welcome customers back inside and offices have reopened to workers with some social distancing rules in place.

Latest News
66
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    Yep, indoor dining is obviously infectious. On the other hand, outdoor dining and outdoor gathering seems not to be, as long as basic precautions are taken.

    The big question is what to do about schools. One of the obstacles, in this regard, is the widespread somewhat hysterical misconception that the children themselves are at mortal risk. Whereas the COVID mortality risk for those under 19 and under (worldwide) is 0%.

  2. Large gatherings of people indoors with lots of loud talking, extended contact, regular mixing of the population, and daily vectoring back into the community. I guess that seems fine?

  3. Avatar for grack grack says:

    I loathe the argument that it’s safe to open schools because children aren’t too affected by the virus. What about the teachers and staff? Also, those kids go home to adults. It’s just mind-boggling. Also, I thought Republicans hated public education, so why the shift?

  4. My guess is no school until a reliable vaccine is available.

    Maybe so, but those that do get it face a risk that adults generally don’t:

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for realzealman Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for dont Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for joelopines Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for nemo Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for schmed Avatar for tena Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for grack Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for txlawyer

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: